Quantcast
  • Home
  • About DC Dicta
  •  

    Thomas speaks, but not clearly

    Today Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas did what he hasn’t done since 2006: made a comment during oral arguments. He even earned a laugh in the process. There’s one problem: no one – including the Court’s transcriptionist – is sure what he said.

    During oral arguments in a case considering competence of counsel, Justice Antonin G. Scalia pointed out that one attorney “was a graduate of Harvard law school, wasn’t he?”

    When attorney Carla Sigler answered that he was, Scalia, a Harvard Law grad, responded: “Son of a gun.”

    In response, Thomas said something to the effect that a degree from Yale – his alma mater – didn’t ensure competency, which drew laughs from his bench mates. But according to the transcript Thomas said: “Well — he did not –,” so his first comment in nearly 7 years was not exactly on the record.

    UPDATE: Perhaps Thomas said: “Or incompetent.” Developing…

    UPDATE II: Maybe it was: “Well, he did not have competent counsel, then.”

      Not a subscriber? Click here to learn more.

      For less than $3.00 a week, read all of Lawyers USA's DC News content and get full online access, including:

    • Complete coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court, including decisions, grants of certiorari, oral arguments and analysis of how the Court's rulings will affect your practice
    • Articles about the latest bills and laws in Congress that impact you and your clients
    • Access to our entire archives of more than 60,000 articles
    • And much more!

      Subscribe today!

    Post a Comment