Quantcast
  • Home
  • About DC Dicta
    •  

    Alito recusal ‘mistake’ cost networks in fleeting expletive case (access required)

    Justice Samuel Alito said he should have recused himself from considering a 2009 Supreme Court case involving federal penalties for televised profanity - a move that would have changed the outcome of the case. When the Court took up the case FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Alito held about $2,000 worth of stock in Disney, the ...

    This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 1st, 2011 at 11:04 am and is filed under Samuel Alito, Supreme Court. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

      Not a subscriber? Click here to learn more.

      For less than $3.00 a week, read all of Lawyers USA's DC News content and get full online access, including:

    • Complete coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court, including decisions, grants of certiorari, oral arguments and analysis of how the Court's rulings will affect your practice
    • Articles about the latest bills and laws in Congress that impact you and your clients
    • Access to our entire archives of more than 60,000 articles

      • And much more!

      Subscribe today!

    One Response to “Alito recusal ‘mistake’ cost networks in fleeting expletive case (access required)”

    1. Michael E. McKinzy, Sr. says:
      June 2, 2011 at 10:17 am

      Like a wise man was said: “The mistakes of my past is what the foundation of my Wisdom is built on!”-Born to do battle, drafted at birth.a.k.a.Warrior Breed!-Michael E. McKinzy, Sr.-06-02-2011

    Post a Comment