Quantcast
  • Home
  • About DC Dicta
    •  

    O’Connor’s advocacy raising ethical questions (access required)

    Since stepping down from the U.S. Supreme Court in 2006, retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor has traveled the nation advocating for the end of state judicial elections. She has also continued to work, sitting on federal appellate courts, hearing dozens of cases and handing down opinions. But some legal ethics experts say she should not be ...

    This entry was posted on Monday, April 11th, 2011 at 7:12 am and is filed under Sandra Day O'Connor, Supreme Court. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

      Not a subscriber? Click here to learn more.

      For less than $3.00 a week, read all of Lawyers USA's DC News content and get full online access, including:

    • Complete coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court, including decisions, grants of certiorari, oral arguments and analysis of how the Court's rulings will affect your practice
    • Articles about the latest bills and laws in Congress that impact you and your clients
    • Access to our entire archives of more than 60,000 articles

      • And much more!

      Subscribe today!

    One Response to “O’Connor’s advocacy raising ethical questions (access required)”

    1. Michael E. McKinzy, Sr. says:
      April 11, 2011 at 10:31 pm

      The price of silence has cost more people their freedom than any amount of words they could ever speak, so having said that I believe Justice O’Connor is putting her freedom where her mouth is, because it’s better to fight for your rights and beliefs than be force to believe you have no right to have your own thoughts and beliefs, even when you turn off the lights you can still hear me!-Born to do battle, drafted at birth.a.k.a.Warrior Breed!-Michael E. McKinzy, Sr.-04-11-2011

    Post a Comment