During oral arguments yesterday in the case J.D.B v. North Carolina, Justice Stephen Breyer was searching for case law that would give guidance on whether age should be a factor in determining whether someone should be read the Miranda warning. The support "comes from three cases: The first is Berkemer [v. McCarty], the second Stansbury [v. ...

This entry was posted on Thursday, March 24th, 2011 at 8:06 am and is filed under Antonin Scalia, Stephen Breyer, Supreme Court, The funniest justice. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.