Comments on: Technical difficulties at the Supreme Court

By: Medicare set aside

Medicare set aside — Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:47:35 +0000

The factor is, it was the advocate that was arguing there was a legal difference in how the courts really should treat pagers rather than email messages within the context of an employment coverage. The Chief Justice was then looking to elicit what the difference was in between the 2 that warranted the legal distinction. Which is precisely what any very good judge must do.

By: Matilde Gasmen

Matilde Gasmen — Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:06:51 +0000

Sala de leos…

http://www.designpiscine.com Pesquisa do armorio de cozinha…

By: GADEL

GADEL — Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:15:15 +0000

In our today’s world, the question about privacy is a whole board game altogether.

By: Hey I really like your blog you did a great job on it. I am working on my own also for YouTube Reviews on the latest gadgets.

Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:11:17 +0000

“YOUTUBE REVIEWS ON THE HOTTEST ELECTRONICS OUT”…

“YOUTUBE REVIEWS ON THE HOTTEST ELECTRONICS OUT”…

By: http://webdesign-boston.com/

http://webdesign-boston.com/ — Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:16:08 +0000

#1 Webdesign Team in the U.S.A…

No job is too small or big for this webdesign team!…

By: lamer40

lamer40 — Mon, 03 Jan 2011 15:24:26 +0000

No comment …

By: DC Dicta » Blog Archive » The year in DC Dicta

DC Dicta » Blog Archive » The year in DC Dicta — Mon, 03 Jan 2011 14:06:40 +0000

[...] 1. Technical difficulties at the Supreme Court [...]

By: DC Dicta » Blog Archive » Justice Breyer will not be your Facebook friend

Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:49:24 +0000

[...] Breyer will not be your Facebook friend The lack of tech savvy among members of the court has been well documented. Now Justice Stephen Breyer admits that the concept of Facebook confounds [...]

By: Court ruling on text-message privacy isn’t as surprising as it seems

Court ruling on text-message privacy isn’t as surprising as it seems — Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:30:10 +0000

[...] part of the court. Not only because technology changes so quickly, but alos because, according to this story, the justices themselves will never be mistaken for gadget [...]

By: SteveP

SteveP — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 04:36:51 +0000

Employee Email privacy has a;ready worked it’s way through the courts and was decided that employees do not have the expectation of privacy on their employee issued email accounts and employee issued PC’s. This prior decision withstanding, the Chief Justice then presented the retorical question “what’s the difference between email and a pager?” meaning why would their be any difference in an expectation of privacy for an employee issued pager (I.E. mobile communication device with text capabilities) vs. the expectation of privacy for employee issued email accounts.

Not only was the Chief Justice’s question not a stupid question, it was actually a very appropriate question.