Quantcast
  • Home
  • About DC Dicta
  •  

    Supremes rule on gun law, Indian land case, and union First Amendment claim

    supremesA conviction for a misdemeanor violent offense against domestic partner is enough to trigger the Federal Gun Control Act, which prohibits the possession a firearm, even where a domestic relationship was not a predicate of the underlying offense, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today.

    That ruling in U. S. v. Hayes was one of three decisions handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court this morning.

    In Carcieri v. Salazar, the Court held that the federal government did not have the authority to take a 31-acre parcel from the Narragansett Tribe and hold it in trust under Indian Reorganization Act, because the tribe wasn’t in existence when the statute went into effect.

    And in Ysursa v. Pocatello Ed. Assn., the Court held that an Idaho law allowing payroll deductions for general union dues but prohibiting deductions for union political activities does not infringe the unions’ First Amendment rights.

      Not a subscriber? Click here to learn more.

      For less than $3.00 a week, read all of Lawyers USA's DC News content and get full online access, including:

    • Complete coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court, including decisions, grants of certiorari, oral arguments and analysis of how the Court's rulings will affect your practice
    • Articles about the latest bills and laws in Congress that impact you and your clients
    • Access to our entire archives of more than 60,000 articles
    • And much more!

      Subscribe today!

    Post a Comment