Quantcast

Title VII case can proceed under ‘cat’s paw’ theory (access required)

Published: July 18, 2012

Tags: , , ,

A Title VII plaintiff could impute the racial animus of a supervisor to the decision maker who imposed discipline against him for horseplay at work, the 6th Circuit has ruled in reversing a summary judgment.

State liable for not reemploying Iraqi War vet (access required)

Published: March 20, 2012

Tags: , ,

Sovereign immunity did not protect a state agency that was sued by the federal government for failing to immediately reemploy a longtime employee after his service in the military ended, the 11th Circuit has ruled in affirming a $26,000 judgment.

USERRA requires comparable earning potential (access required)

Published: September 15, 2011

Tags: , ,

A bank violated federal employment discrimination law when it failed to reinstate a financial advisor to a position with similar client accounts and commission opportunities when he returned from military service, the 2nd Circuit has ruled in affirming judgment.

Employer liable for ‘willful’ USERRA violation (access required)

Published: September 13, 2011

Tags: ,

An employer is liable for liquidated damages based on its “willful” failure to reemploy a plaintiff following his return from military service, the 1st Circuit has ruled in affirming a $740,000 award of damages, interest and attorney fees.

Soldiers can’t sue for hostile environment (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: March 24, 2011

Tags: ,

Airline pilots could not sue their employer for maintaining a work environment that was hostile to their military service, the 5th Circuit has ruled in affirming a dismissal.

Military veteran didn’t ‘abandon’ civilian job (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: March 3, 2011

Tags: ,

A member of the National Guard did not waive his reemployment rights under federal law by “abandoning” his civilian career, the Federal Circuit has ruled in reversing judgment.

EMPLOYMENT (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: March 1, 2011

Tags: , , , , , ,

An employer may be liable under a “cat’s paw” theory for violating federal law protecting the job rights of military veterans.

See “‘Cat’s paw’ liability may exist for anti-military bias

U.S. Supreme Court. Staub v. Proctor
» Continue Reading.

‘Cat’s paw’ liability may exist for anti-military bias (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: March 1, 2011

Tags: , , , , , ,

An employer may be liable under a “cat’s paw” theory for violating federal law protecting the job rights of military veterans, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in an 8-0 decision.

Employee waived his rights as returning veteran (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: June 18, 2010

Tags: , ,

An employee waived his right to sue under a federal law protecting the re-employment rights of U.S. military service members when he signed a release of claims upon his termination, the 6th Circuit has ruled in affirming a summary judgment.

EMPLOYMENT (access required)

By: Correy Stephenson
Published: April 19, 2010

Tags: , ,

When can an employer be held liable under a “cat’s paw” theory of employment discrimination, where the unlawful intent came not from the ultimate decisionmaker but from a nondecisionmaker who influenced the decision?

See “When is an employer liable under a ‘cat’s paw’ theory?

Sign-up for alerts