Quantcast

Supreme Court allows third-party retaliation claims (access required)

By: Kimberly Atkins
Published: January 26, 2011

Tags: , , , ,

In a ruling employment attorneys say is likely to keep lower courts busy, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the fired fiancé of a worker who filed a discrimination complaint to bring a retaliation action under Title VII.

Fiancé can sue for retaliation under Title VII (access required)

By: Kimberly Atkins
Published: January 24, 2011

Tags: , , , ,

A worker who was fired after his fiancée filed a discrimination charge against their employer may file a retaliation claim under Title VII, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled.

RETALIATION (access required)

By: Kimberly Atkins
Published: January 24, 2011

Tags: , , , ,

A worker who was fired after his fiancée filed a discrimination charge against their employer may file a retaliation claim under Title VII.

See “Fiancé can sue for retaliation under Title VII

U.S. Supreme Court. Thompson v. North American Stainless, No. 09-291. Jan. 24, 2011. Lawyers
» Continue Reading.

Sex discrimination lawsuit is timely (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: January 13, 2011

Tags: , ,

A plaintiff did not inadvertently trigger the time period for filing her sexual discrimination lawsuit by calling the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to learn the status of her claim, the 7th Circuit has ruled in reversing a dismissal.

Gay employee can sue for retaliatory discharge (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: January 12, 2011

Tags: , , , ,

A gay employee who was fired after complaining about workplace slurs could sue for retaliatory discharge, the 9th Circuit has ruled in reversing judgment.

Supreme Court hears oral arguments in retaliation case (access required)

By: Kimberly Atkins
Published: December 7, 2010

Tags: , , , ,

WASHINGTON – Workplace romances can be perilous in the best of circumstances. But when an employee is fired after his sweetie files a discrimination complaint against the company, can he sue for retaliation under Title VII?

The justices of the U.S. Supreme Court debated that issue during Tuesday’s oral argument in Thompson  v. North American Stainless.

Justices to review certification of Wal-Mart Title VII class (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: December 6, 2010

Tags: , ,

The U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether thousands of female workers can proceed as a class in a lawsuit alleging that Wal-Mart violated Title VII by paying them less than their male counterparts.

Supervisor may be liable for retaliation (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: November 18, 2010

Tags: ,

An employee’s supervisor may be personally liable for engaging in retaliation in violation of state law, the Arkansas Supreme Court has ruled in answering a certified question from a U.S. District Court.

Successor firm can be sued under Title VII (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: September 16, 2010

Tags: ,

A race discrimination plaintiff did not have the threshold burden of showing that a company she was suing came from an asset purchase or merger in order to sue under a theory of successor liability, a U.S. District Court in Oklahoma has ruled in denying a motion to dismiss.

Title VII plaintiff can sue for mixed-motive retaliation (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: September 15, 2010

Tags: , , , , , , ,

A race discrimination plaintiff could sue her employer for mixed-motive retaliation, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has ruled.

Sign-up for alerts

NEW FREE WHITE PAPER: E-Discovery

This FREE e-report brought to you by Lawyers USA contains the latest tips for conducting thorough and successful electronic discovery for your trial in 2012. We’ve analyzed the latest court rulings and trends in e-discovery to help you and your clients avoid sanctions and win your case.

Click here to get your free White Paper today!