Quantcast

Federal courts can hear suits over ‘robo-calls’ (access required)

Published: January 18, 2012

Tags: , ,

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s grant of permissive jurisdiction to state courts did not deprive a federal court of jurisdiction to hear the lawsuit of a plaintiff who claimed he was victimized by a debt collector’s use of an automated dialing system to place collection calls, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in a unanimous decision.

CONSUMER PROTECTION (access required)

Published: January 18, 2012

Tags: , ,

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s grant of permissive jurisdiction to state courts did not deprive a federal court of jurisdiction to hear the lawsuit of a plaintiff who claimed he was victimized by a debt collector’s use of an automated dialing system to place collection calls.

See “» Continue Reading.

Can federal court hear telemarketing abuse claims? (access required)

By: Kimberly Atkins
Published: November 28, 2011

Tags: , , ,

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Supreme Court tried to decipher the strange wording of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act on Monday to determine if plaintiffs can sue in federal court rather than state court.

Class counsel’s misconduct may preclude certification (access required)

Published: November 28, 2011

Tags: , ,

A defendant sued for sending unsolicited fax advertisements did not have show “egregious” misconduct by plaintiffs’ counsel in order to block class certification, the 7th Circuit has ruled in reversing judgment.

Individual buyout moots TCPA class action (access required)

Published: November 22, 2011

Tags: , ,

A defendant sued for sending unsolicited text message advertisements could moot a proposed class action by offering the plaintiff his full request for relief, the 7th Circuit has ruled in affirming a dismissal.

State law limits suit over unsolicited faxes (access required)

Published: October 20, 2011

Tags: , , ,

State law provided the statute of limitations for a class action alleging that a business sent unsolicited fax advertisements in violation of federal consumer protection law, the 2nd Circuit has ruled in affirming a dismissal.

Automated call didn’t violate TCPA (access required)

Published: October 14, 2011

Tags: ,

An automated call to a home didn’t violated federal consumer protection law because it was placed in response to a resident’s Craigslist advertisement, West Virginia’s highest court has ruled in affirming a dismissal.

Class plaintiffs needn’t show receipt of junk faxes (access required)

Published: October 6, 2011

Tags: , , ,

Plaintiffs were not required to establish the actual receipt of unsolicited fax advertisements in order to proceed with a class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the Kansas Supreme Court has ruled in affirming certification.

Plaintiff can seek automated, do-not-call damages (access required)

Published: September 6, 2011

Tags: , , ,

A plaintiff could recover statutory damages under both the automated-call and do-not-call-list subsections of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the 6th Circuit has ruled in reversing a dismissal.

Junk fax suit can’t proceed as class action (access required)

Published: July 21, 2011

Tags: , , ,

A plaintiff could not seek class-wide relief when pursuing a private cause of action under federal law prohibiting the sending of unsolicited fax advertisements, the New Jersey Appellate Division has ruled in affirming a dismissal.

Sign-up for alerts

SUBSCRIBERS: Did you receive the new Lawyers USA Weekly Update in your inbox on Monday?

If not, click here to register and learn more now.