Quantcast

Retainer held by law firm can be garnished (access required)

Published: August 25, 2011

Tags: , ,

State law allows the garnishment of the unearned portion of a retainer held by a law firm, the Colorado Court of Appeals has ruled in affirming judgment.

‘Open-ended’ retainer doesn’t trigger disqualification (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: March 28, 2011

Tags: ,

A law firm wasn’t subject to automatic disqualification in a land development lawsuit based on a past “open-ended” retainer agreement with an opposing party, the California Court of Appeal has ruled in reversing judgment.

Attorney can’t charge ‘engagement’ fee (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: February 21, 2011

Tags: , ,

An attorney violated state disciplinary rules by charging new clients a nonrefundable “engagement” fee, the Indiana Supreme Court has ruled in ordering a public reprimand.

Law firm can’t enforce forum selection clause (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: October 17, 2010

Tags: , , , ,

A law firm could not enforce a forum selection in its retainer agreement with a client, a U.S. District Court in West Virginia has ruled in denying a motion to dismiss.

Contingent fee reduced (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: August 31, 2010

Tags: ,

A law firm could be required to refund a portion of a contingent fee that was deemed “unreasonable” based on events that occurred after the client executed her retainer agreement, the Colorado Court of Appeal has ruled in affirming judgment.

Solo forced out of lawsuit can sue for conversion (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: May 3, 2010

Tags: ,

A solo practitioner who was allegedly forced out of a personal injury lawsuit could sue for conversion once the matter was settled, the California Court of Appeal has ruled in reversing judgment.

Sign-up for alerts

NEW FREE WHITE PAPER: E-Discovery

This FREE e-report brought to you by Lawyers USA contains the latest tips for conducting thorough and successful electronic discovery for your trial in 2012. We’ve analyzed the latest court rulings and trends in e-discovery to help you and your clients avoid sanctions and win your case.

Click here to get your free White Paper today!