Quantcast

Lender that used wrong form didn’t violate TILA (access required)

Published: December 19, 2011

Tags: , ,

A mortgage lender did not violate federal consumer protection law when it failed to use the correct notice form for a mortgage refinancing, the 4th Circuit has ruled in affirming a dismissal.

TILA plaintiff may have extended right to rescind loan (access required)

Published: December 8, 2011

Tags: , , ,

A consumer protection plaintiff may have three years to rescind a home loan due to his lender’s alleged failure provide all the required notices in a mortgage refinancing transaction, the 7th Circuit has ruled in reversing a summary judgment.

‘Ability-to-pay’ proposals for Regulation Z open for comment (access required)

Published: May 17, 2011

Tags: , , , , , ,

The Federal Reserve Board has requested public comment on proposed revisions to Regulation Z that would require lenders to determine a consumer’s ability to repay a mortgage before making a loan.

Court rules cardholder not entitled to advance notice (access required)

By: Correy Stephenson
Published: January 24, 2011

Tags: ,

At the time of the transactions at issue, the Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z did not require a credit card issuer to provide change-in-terms notice before increasing the interest rate, the U.S Supreme Court has ruled in an unanimous decision.

Justices consider credit card notice rule (access required)

By: Kimberly Atkins
Published: December 8, 2010

Tags: , ,

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case that will decide what notice credit card companies must give to consumers about interest rate increases under a now-changed federal regulation.

Credit card solicitation violated TILA (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: July 22, 2010

Tags: ,

A direct-mail credit card solicitation violated federal consumer protection law because it misled card users regarding the circumstances under which their interest rates could be raised, the 9th Circuit has ruled in reversing a dismissal.

Court to rule in TILA case (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: June 21, 2010

Tags: , , ,

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether the Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z require a credit card issuer to provide change-in-terms notice before increasing the interest rate on an account pursuant to a consumer default term in the cardholder agreement.

CONSUMER PROTECTION (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: June 21, 2010

Tags: , , ,

Does Regulation Z require a credit card issuer to provide change-in-terms notice before increasing the interest rate?

See “Court to rule in TILA case.”

Chase Bank USA v. McCoy, No. 09-329. Certiorari granted June 21, 2010. Ruling
» Continue Reading.

‘Additional’ credit card holder can’t sue under TILA (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: May 21, 2010

Tags: ,

Federal law did not obligate a credit card company to resolve a dispute with a consumer who received his card through an account holder, the 9th Circuit has ruled in affirming a dismissal.

New Reg Z credit card rule proposed (access required)

By: Kimberly Atkins
Published: March 5, 2010

Tags: ,

WASHINGTON – The Federal Reserve Board has proposed a new rule that would protect credit card customers from unreasonable fees and penalties for late payments, and dissuade card companies from making drastic interest rate hikes.

Sign-up for alerts

SUBSCRIBERS: Did you receive the new Lawyers USA Weekly Update in your inbox on Monday?

If not, click here to register and learn more now.