Quantcast

Court: Risk-hedging strategy can’t be patented (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: June 28, 2010

Tags: ,

Businessmen could not seek a patent on an investment concept that purported to show energy market investors how to hedge against the risk of price changes, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: June 28, 2010

Tags: ,

Businessmen could not seek a patent on an investment strategy that purported to show energy market investors how to hedge against the risk of price changes.

Federal Circuit agrees to rehear case on patent rules (access required)

By: Correy Stephenson
Published: July 7, 2009

Tags: ,

The Federal Circuit has agreed to rehear the Tafas v. Dudas case en banc, which puts the validity of rules promulgated by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office at issue.

J&J wins record $1.67B patent verdict (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: June 30, 2009

Tags:

Johnson & Johnson’s Centocor unit won $1.67 billion, the largest patent verdict in U.S. history, from Abbott Laboratories over an invention used to produce the Humira arthritis drug. A federal jury in Marshall, Texas, sided with J&J, the world’s biggest health-care company, after five hours of deliberations yesterday, finding Abbott’s actions were willful and J&J is owed $1.17 billion in lost profits and $504 million in royalties. Click here for the full article from Bloomberg News.

PATENT (access required)

By: Justin Rebello
Published: June 4, 2009

Tags:

Must a “machine-or-transformation” test be applied to a particular apparatus in order for it to be eligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. §10? U.S. Supreme Court. Bilski v. Doll. Certiorari granted June 1, 2009. Ruling below: 545 F.3d 943 (Fed. Cir. 2008).

Court orders EchoStar to pay TiVo $103 million (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: June 3, 2009

Tags:

Satellite service provider EchoStar is in contempt of a permanent injunction against using some of TiVo’s technology and must pay the DVR pioneer $103.1 million plus interest, a court ruled Tuesday. Click here for the full article from Reuters.

Microsoft loses $200M jury verdict in i4i patent trial (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: May 21, 2009

Tags:

Microsoft Corp., the world’s largest software maker, was ordered by a Texas federal jury to pay $200 million to a Canadian company over a patented way to process electronic documents in Microsoft’s Word products. Click here for the full article from Bloomberg News.

Texas jury awards $72.6M for botched patent application (access required)

By: Nora Tooher
Published: May 14, 2009

Tags:

A large Dallas-based law firm has been found negligent in bungling a patent and ordered to pay $72.6 million in damages.

ACLU lawsuit attacks patenting of human genes (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: May 14, 2009

Tags: ,

A lawsuit naming the University of Utah and a Salt Lake City company has launched a major assault on the U.S. government’s grants of patents for human genes, arguing the practice denies women with breast and ovarian cancer the benefit of new tests and possible treatments. Click
» Continue Reading.

Court finds patent rules valid (access required)

By: Correy Stephenson
Published: March 24, 2009

Tags:

Rules promulgated by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office are valid, the Federal Circuit has ruled.

Sign-up for alerts

NEW FREE WHITE PAPER: E-Discovery

This FREE e-report brought to you by Lawyers USA contains the latest tips for conducting thorough and successful electronic discovery for your trial in 2012. We’ve analyzed the latest court rulings and trends in e-discovery to help you and your clients avoid sanctions and win your case.

Click here to get your free White Paper today!