Quantcast

Fla. jury awards $250K in Zometa jaw injury suit (access required)

Published: March 18, 2013

Tags: , , , , ,

A federal jury has awarded $250,000 to a Florida couple who claimed Novartis Pharmaceuticals failed to adequately warn of the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw from taking the bone strengthening drug Zometa.

J. Hunter Chiles III will received $200,000 in compensatory damages under a » Continue Reading.

Fosamax suit can’t proceed based on ‘sham’ issue (access required)

Published: February 4, 2013

Tags: , , , , ,

Irreconcilable contradictions in expert testimony prevented a product liability plaintiff from establishing that Merck failed to provide adequate warnings with the osteoporosis drug Fosamax, the 2nd Circuit has ruled in affirming judgment.

Fosamax litigation ready for next step in bellwether cases (access required)

By: Correy Stephenson
Published: December 4, 2012

Tags: , , , , ,

Six years after the first Fosamax lawsuit was filed, litigation over the osteoporosis drug is about to start a new chapter.

The suits against Merck, the drug’s manufacturer, fall into two categories: plaintiffs alleging they suffer from osteonecrosis, or jaw damage, and those claiming they suffered a non-traumatic femur fracture as a result of taking the drug.

Benchmarks: N.J. court upholds Novartis win in Zometa bellwether trial (access required)

Published: June 14, 2012

Tags: , , , , , ,

A New Jersey appeals court yesterday upheld a defense verdict for Novartis Pharmaceuticals in a product liability lawsuit brought by a woman who claimed she developed osteonecrosis of the jaw after taking Aredia and Zometa.

Special master appointed to help settle Fosamax cases (access required)

Published: December 7, 2011

Tags: , , ,

After mixed results in bellwether cases, and a recent string of defense verdicts, a special settlement master has been appointed to the Fosamax multidistrict litigation.

New warning label excluded from Zometa trial (access required)

Published: April 18, 2011

Tags: , , , ,

A product liability plaintiff could not introduce evidence that the defendant added a new warning label to the osteoporosis drug that allegedly injured her husband, a U.S. District Court in New York has ruled in granting a motion in limine.

First state trial in Fosamax case ends with defense win (access required)

By: Sylvia Hsieh
Published: February 25, 2011

Tags: , , , ,

In the first bellwether state trial over the osteoporosis drug Fosamax, Merck won a defense verdict last week.

Class action tolling preserves Zometa claim (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: January 14, 2011

Tags: , , , ,

The doctrine of class action tolling applied to preserve the product liability lawsuit of a woman who claimed she suffered osteonecrosis of the jaw as a result of taking the prescription drug Zometa, the Montana Supreme Court has ruled.

Drug company hit with $13 million failure-to-warn verdict (access required)

By: Sylvia Adcock
Published: December 3, 2010

Tags: , , , , ,

A federal jury in North Carolina has returned a verdict of nearly $13 million against pharmaceutical giant Novartis, saying the company failed to adequately warn patients and doctors about the risks of taking the bone-strengthening drugs Zometa and Aredia.

Next Fosamax trial nears (access required)

By: Nora Tooher
Published: September 21, 2010

Tags: , , ,

Jury selection in the third Fosamax bellwether trial is slated for Oct. 28 in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Sign-up for alerts