MIRANDA WARNING 
Published: June 16, 2011
Tags: Criminal Law, juvenile, Miranda, police questioning, Supreme Court
The age of a juvenile is a factor that must be considered in determining whether the child is “in custody” for Miranda purposes.
See “Justices: Age factor in Miranda analysis”
U.S. Supreme Court. J.D.B. v. North Carolina, No. 09-11121. June 16, 2011. Lawyers USA No. 993-3009.
Justices: Age must factor in to ‘Miranda rights’ analysis
Published: June 16, 2011
Tags: Criminal Law, juvenile, Miranda, police questioning, Supreme Court
The age of a juvenile is a factor that must be considered in determining whether the child is “in custody” for Miranda purposes, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled.
Court considers whether age affects ‘Miranda’ rights
By:
Kimberly Atkins
Published: March 23, 2011
Tags: Criminal Law, juvenile, Miranda, police questioning, Supreme Court
WASHINGTON – “You are free to leave” is a statement that seems easy enough to understand. But when those words are told to a young person at school, does the child’s age make a difference under Miranda v. Arizona?
That’s the question the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court considered Wednesday during oral arguments in J.D.B v. North Carolina.
Issue of ‘Miranda’ warnings in schools headed to High Court
By:
Sylvia Adcock
Published: March 15, 2011
Tags: Miranda, Supreme Court
A case out of North Carolina that is about to go before the U.S. Supreme Court could determine whether a juvenile’s age should be considered in a Miranda custody analysis.
Justices to decide prisoner’s ‘Miranda’ rights
By:
Pat Murphy
Published: January 24, 2011
Tags: Miranda
The U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether a prisoner was “in custody” for Miranda purposes when he was isolated from the general prison population and questioned about conduct occurring outside the prison.
‘MIRANDA’ RIGHTS
By:
Pat Murphy
Published: January 24, 2011
Tags: Miranda
Is a prisoner “in custody” for Miranda purposes any time that he is isolated from the general prison population and questioned about conduct occurring outside the prison?
See “Justices to decide prisoner’s ‘Miranda’ rights”
Howes v. Fields, No.10-680. Certiorari
» Continue Reading.
For Supremes, 2010 marked by landmarks
By:
Kimberly Atkins
Published: December 30, 2010
Tags: attorney fees, Elena Kagan, Employment Law, Miranda, privacy, Supreme Court
WASHINGTON – At the U.S. Supreme Court, 2010 was an historic year that brought not only some of the most significant rulings in decades in areas such as the Sixth Amendment and labor law, but also saw historic changes to the Court itself.
Two-step interrogation violates ‘Miranda’
By:
Pat Murphy
Published: December 6, 2010
Tags: Miranda
A theft defendant did not validly waive his Miranda rights when he confessed to investigators in an interview session that followed a custodial interrogation in which he was not advised of his rights, the 2nd Circuit has ruled in affirming a suppression order.
SEARCH AND SEIZURE
By:
Kimberly Atkins
Published: November 1, 2010
Tags: Miranda, search and seizure
Can a court consider factors such as age in determining whether a youth is in police custody and therefore entitled to Miranda rights?
See “Court to consider ‘Miranda’ age factor”
J.D.B. v. North Carolina, No. 09-11121. Certiorari granted: Nov. 1, 2010. Ruling below: Unpublished (No. 190A09, Dec.
» Continue Reading.
Court to consider ‘Miranda’ age factor
By:
Kimberly Atkins
Published: November 1, 2010
Tags: Miranda, search and seizure
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to decide if considerations such as age are factors in determining whether a youth is in police custody and therefore entitled to Miranda rights.
NEW FREE WHITE PAPER: E-Discovery
This FREE e-report brought to you by Lawyers USA contains the latest tips for conducting thorough and successful electronic discovery for your trial in 2012. We’ve analyzed the latest court rulings and trends in e-discovery to help you and your clients avoid sanctions and win your case.
Click here to get your free White Paper today!
