Police didn’t violate juvenile’s ‘Miranda’ rights 
Published: January 17, 2012
Tags: juvenile, Miranda, murder
Police didn’t violate a juvenile murder suspect’s right to remain silent by continuing an interrogation despite his repeated requests to see his mother, the California Supreme Court has ruled.
Are police required to re-Mirandize for new charges?
By:
Kimberly Atkins
Published: October 5, 2011
Tags: in custody, jail inmate, Miranda, Supreme Court
WASHINGTON – The justices of the U.S. Supreme Court considered on Tuesday whether a jail inmate must be Mirandized before police can question him about an unrelated charge.
Defense lawyers cheer child ‘Miranda’ protection ruling
By:
Kimberly Atkins
Published: June 24, 2011
Tags: Criminal Law, juvenile, Miranda, police questioning, Supreme Court
The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling that the age of a juvenile is a factor that must be considered in determining whether the child is “in custody” for Miranda purposes is common-sense protection against coercive interrogation techniques, defense attorneys and juvenile advocates say.
MIRANDA WARNING
Published: June 16, 2011
Tags: Criminal Law, juvenile, Miranda, police questioning, Supreme Court
The age of a juvenile is a factor that must be considered in determining whether the child is “in custody” for Miranda purposes.
See “Justices: Age factor in Miranda analysis”
U.S. Supreme Court. J.D.B. v. North Carolina, No. 09-11121. June 16, 2011. Lawyers USA No. 993-3009.
Justices: Age must factor in to ‘Miranda rights’ analysis
Published: June 16, 2011
Tags: Criminal Law, juvenile, Miranda, police questioning, Supreme Court
The age of a juvenile is a factor that must be considered in determining whether the child is “in custody” for Miranda purposes, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled.
Court considers whether age affects ‘Miranda’ rights
By:
Kimberly Atkins
Published: March 23, 2011
Tags: Criminal Law, juvenile, Miranda, police questioning, Supreme Court
WASHINGTON – “You are free to leave” is a statement that seems easy enough to understand. But when those words are told to a young person at school, does the child’s age make a difference under Miranda v. Arizona?
That’s the question the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court considered Wednesday during oral arguments in J.D.B v. North Carolina.
Issue of ‘Miranda’ warnings in schools headed to High Court
By:
Sylvia Adcock
Published: March 15, 2011
Tags: Miranda, Supreme Court
A case out of North Carolina that is about to go before the U.S. Supreme Court could determine whether a juvenile’s age should be considered in a Miranda custody analysis.
Justices to decide prisoner’s ‘Miranda’ rights
By:
Pat Murphy
Published: January 24, 2011
Tags: Miranda
The U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether a prisoner was “in custody” for Miranda purposes when he was isolated from the general prison population and questioned about conduct occurring outside the prison.
‘MIRANDA’ RIGHTS
By:
Pat Murphy
Published: January 24, 2011
Tags: Miranda
Is a prisoner “in custody” for Miranda purposes any time that he is isolated from the general prison population and questioned about conduct occurring outside the prison?
See “Justices to decide prisoner’s ‘Miranda’ rights”
Howes v. Fields, No.10-680. Certiorari
» Continue Reading.
For Supremes, 2010 marked by landmarks
By:
Kimberly Atkins
Published: December 30, 2010
Tags: attorney fees, Elena Kagan, Employment Law, Miranda, privacy, Supreme Court
WASHINGTON – At the U.S. Supreme Court, 2010 was an historic year that brought not only some of the most significant rulings in decades in areas such as the Sixth Amendment and labor law, but also saw historic changes to the Court itself.
SUBSCRIBERS: Did you receive the new Lawyers USA Weekly Update in your inbox on Monday?
If not, click here to register and learn more now.
