<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawyers USA Online &#187; Longshore and Harbor Workers&#8217; Compensation Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/tag/longshore-and-harbor-workers-compensation-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com</link>
	<description>Your Business Partner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 20:59:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Suicide attempt compensable under Longshore Act&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/12/suicide-attempt-compensable-under-longshore-act/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/12/suicide-attempt-compensable-under-longshore-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A dock worker who injured himself in a suicide attempt may be entitled to benefits under the federal Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in reversing an administrative denial of benefits.</p> <p>In 2001, the plaintiff suffered serious injuries when he fell <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/12/suicide-attempt-compensable-under-longshore-act/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/12/suicide-attempt-compensable-under-longshore-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exxon escapes $17.5M asbestos judgment&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/24/exxon-escapes-17-5m-asbestos-judgment/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/24/exxon-escapes-17-5m-asbestos-judgment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=90888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An asbestos defendant should have been permitted to introduce evidence that it had no duty to intervene to protect the plaintiff because of the safety programs implemented by the plaintiff’s employer, the Virginia Supreme Court has ruled in reversing a $17.5 million judgment.</p> <p>The plaintiff worked at a shipyard from <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/24/exxon-escapes-17-5m-asbestos-judgment/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/24/exxon-escapes-17-5m-asbestos-judgment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Longshore Act maximum rate set at date of disability&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/03/20/longshore-act-maximum-rate-set-at-date-of-disability/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/03/20/longshore-act-maximum-rate-set-at-date-of-disability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 19:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Month's Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/03/20/longshore-act-maximum-rate-set-at-date-of-disability/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The maximum workers’ compensation benefits available to a longshoreman must be based on the national average weekly wage for the fiscal year in which he became disabled, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled.</p> <p>The decision affirms a ruling from the 9th Circuit.</p> <p>Section 906(c) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/03/20/longshore-act-maximum-rate-set-at-date-of-disability/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/03/20/longshore-act-maximum-rate-set-at-date-of-disability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
