<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawyers USA Online &#187; fraudulent conveyance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/tag/fraudulent-conveyance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com</link>
	<description>Your Business Partner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:05:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bankruptcy judge lacked power to remedy fraud&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/06/bankruptcy-judge-lacked-power-to-remedy-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/06/bankruptcy-judge-lacked-power-to-remedy-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraudulent conveyance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=89753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A bankruptcy judge lacked the constitutional authority to enter a final judgment in a fraudulent conveyance action against a nonclaimant to a bankruptcy estate, the 9th Circuit has ruled.</p> <p>Before filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection, an insurance agency deposited $373,000 in commission income into an account controlled by a <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/06/bankruptcy-judge-lacked-power-to-remedy-fraud/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/06/bankruptcy-judge-lacked-power-to-remedy-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Title VII plaintiff liable for taxes from bankruptcy&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/08/06/title-vii-plaintiff-liable-for-taxes-from-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/08/06/title-vii-plaintiff-liable-for-taxes-from-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Month's Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraudulent conveyance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=72337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A race discrimination plaintiff was liable for taxes due on a $550,000 jury award that had become property of her bankruptcy estate, the U.S. Tax Court has ruled in affirming a $180,000 deficiency assessment.</p> <p>A jury awarded the taxpayer $550,000 in a Title VII discrimination case against Wal-Mart.</p> <p>The taxpayer <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/08/06/title-vii-plaintiff-liable-for-taxes-from-bankruptcy/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/08/06/title-vii-plaintiff-liable-for-taxes-from-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shareholder payments can’t be avoided in bankruptcy&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2009/07/09/shareholder-payments-can%e2%80%99t-be-avoided-in-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2009/07/09/shareholder-payments-can%e2%80%99t-be-avoided-in-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraudulent conveyance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2009/07/09/shareholder-payments-can%e2%80%99t-be-avoided-in-bankruptcy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Payments made to shareholders to conclude a leveraged buyout couldn’t be avoided as fraudulent conveyances when the company later declared bankruptcy, the 6th Circuit has ruled in affirming judgment.</p> <p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">The defendants in the case were 170 shareholders of a privately held corporation. They were paid $111.5 <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2009/07/09/shareholder-payments-can%e2%80%99t-be-avoided-in-bankruptcy/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2009/07/09/shareholder-payments-can%e2%80%99t-be-avoided-in-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fraud doesn’t jeopardize homestead exemption&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2009/04/09/fraud-doesn%e2%80%99t-jeopardize-homestead-exemption/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2009/04/09/fraud-doesn%e2%80%99t-jeopardize-homestead-exemption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraudulent conveyance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homestead exemption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=2067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A Chapter 7 debtor couldn’t be denied a homestead exemption on the basis that he had temporarily conveyed his residential property in an alleged attempt to defraud creditors, the 1st Circuit has ruled.</p> <p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">The debtor and his wife purchased a Massachusetts home as tenants by the <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2009/04/09/fraud-doesn%e2%80%99t-jeopardize-homestead-exemption/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2009/04/09/fraud-doesn%e2%80%99t-jeopardize-homestead-exemption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
