Quantcast

Fax to employer didn’t violate Fair Debt Act (access required)

Published: December 23, 2011

Tags: , ,

A fax to a debtor’s employer didn’t constitute a “communication” under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the 10th Circuit has ruled.

Bill to toughen frivolous lawsuit sanctions advances (access required)

Published: July 11, 2011

Tags: , , , , ,

WASHINGTON – Sanctions against attorneys who file frivolous lawsuits in federal court would be toughened under legislation advanced by the House Judiciary Committee.

Supremes nix Wal-Mart workers’ class action bid (access required)

Published: June 20, 2011

Tags: , , , ,

A group of more than a million sex discrimination plaintiffs cannot be certified as a class under Rule 23(a) because their claims do not depend upon a common contention capable of class-wide resolution, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled.

CLASS ACTIONS (access required)

Published: June 20, 2011

Tags: , , , ,

A group of more than a million sex discrimination plaintiffs cannot be certified as a class under Rule 23(a) because their claims do not depend upon a common contention capable of class-wide resolution.

See “Supremes nix Wal-Mart workers’ class action bid

U.S. Supreme Court. Wal-Mart Stores v.
» Continue Reading.

Expert report may be required for treating physicians (access required)

Published: May 6, 2011

Tags: , ,

A plaintiff in a personal injury case may be required to file witness reports for treating physicians who are prepared to render expert opinions, the 9th Circuit has ruled.

Expert witness preparation after the 2010 amendments (access required)

By: W. William Hodes
Published: April 29, 2011

Tags: , , , , ,

Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which broadly addresses the scope of permissible discovery and the basic rules of the road, has been thoroughly overhauled several times and tweaked almost continuously since its original inclusion in the Rules in 1938.

Wal-Mart employees face Supreme skepticism (access required)

By: Kimberly Atkins
Published: March 29, 2011

Tags: , , , ,

WASHINGTON – The case of Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes involves a complex set of legal and procedural issues that will determine whether a group of 1.5 million current and former retail store employees can join to form the largest class ever in an employment discrimination case.

Sanctions for e-discovery violations at ‘historic’ high (access required)

By: Christina Pazzanese
Published: February 14, 2011

Tags: , , , ,

Sanction motions and awards for e-discovery violations across the country have climbed dramatically in recent years and have now hit “historic highs,” according to a study published in the Duke Law Journal.

State SLAPP law applies in federal court (access required)

By: Thomas E. Egan and David E. Frank
Published: January 6, 2011

Tags: , , , , , ,

More litigants may be able to take advantage of state anti-SLAPP laws in federal court following a recent 1st Circuit ruling.

Federal rules ‘muddy’ on new-trial filing deadlines (access required)

By: Christina Pazzanese
Published: January 3, 2011

Tags:

A recent ruling by a U.S. District Court judge in Massachusetts on a defendant’s motion for a new trial highlights an ambiguity in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Sign-up for alerts

NEW FREE WHITE PAPER: E-Discovery

This FREE e-report brought to you by Lawyers USA contains the latest tips for conducting thorough and successful electronic discovery for your trial in 2012. We’ve analyzed the latest court rulings and trends in e-discovery to help you and your clients avoid sanctions and win your case.

Click here to get your free White Paper today!