<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawyers USA Online &#187; federal agencies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/tag/federal-agencies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com</link>
	<description>Your Business Partner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:49:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>HHS proposes tougher child care safety measures&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/17/hhs-proposes-tougher-child-care-safety-measures/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/17/hhs-proposes-tougher-child-care-safety-measures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Health and Human Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON – New proposed regulations would impose stricter safety requirements on child care providers who receive federal funding.</p> <p>Under the proposed Department of Health and Human Services rules, child care providers who accept Child Care and Development Fund funding  — about 500,000 providers serving an estimated 1.6 million children — <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/17/hhs-proposes-tougher-child-care-safety-measures/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/17/hhs-proposes-tougher-child-care-safety-measures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NLRB advice on confidential investigations has lawyers reading tea leaves&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/08/nlrb-advice-on-confidential-investigations-has-lawyers-reading-tea-leaves/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/08/nlrb-advice-on-confidential-investigations-has-lawyers-reading-tea-leaves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 17:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Labor Relations Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLRB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON – The employment bar was roiled last year when the National Labor Relations Board ruled that a company policy requiring employees to keep interviews related to internal investigations confidential violated federal labor law.</p> <p>But since then, the agency has been informally placing limits on that holding by issuing advice <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/08/nlrb-advice-on-confidential-investigations-has-lawyers-reading-tea-leaves/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/08/nlrb-advice-on-confidential-investigations-has-lawyers-reading-tea-leaves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court takes up ‘Chevron’ jurisdictional issue&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/16/court-takes-up-chevron-jurisdictional-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/16/court-takes-up-chevron-jurisdictional-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 23:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevron deference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=90632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON – While courts have long given deference to federal agencies’ reasonable interpretations of statutes under <em>Chevron USA v. NRDC</em>, the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court wrestled with the open question of whether <em>Chevron</em> deference extends to an agency’s determination of its own statutory jurisdiction.</p> <p>The case of <em><a <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/16/court-takes-up-chevron-jurisdictional-issue/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></a></em></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/16/court-takes-up-chevron-jurisdictional-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill to unify agency privilege standard awaits signing&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/18/bill-to-unify-agency-privilege-standard-await-signing/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/18/bill-to-unify-agency-privilege-standard-await-signing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFPB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privilege]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=89996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON – Legislation that would impose a single standard on how privileged information submitted to any federal agency is treated has passed both houses in Congress and is expected to be signed by President Barack Obama.</p> <p>The measure, <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:h.r.04014:" target="_blank">H.R. 4014</a>, which received the support of the American Bar <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/18/bill-to-unify-agency-privilege-standard-await-signing/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/18/bill-to-unify-agency-privilege-standard-await-signing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justices to decide agency deference standard&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/10/justices-to-decide-agency-deference-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/10/justices-to-decide-agency-deference-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 19:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Month's Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevron deference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=88369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether a court should give <em>Chevron</em> deference to an agency’s interpretation of its own jurisdiction.</p> <p>The case involves a provision of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 that governs the authority of state and local governments regarding the placement and construction of wireless <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/10/justices-to-decide-agency-deference-standard/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/10/justices-to-decide-agency-deference-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal employers cut time for processing complaints&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/08/27/federal-employers-cut-time-for-processing-complaints-report-finds/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/08/27/federal-employers-cut-time-for-processing-complaints-report-finds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[age discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equal Employment Opportunity Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=87108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-76357" title="equality-form" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files//2011/01/equality-form.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="133" />Federal employers have reduced the time they take to process job discrimination complaints, according to a new study by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.</p> <p>Between 2010 and 2011, federal agencies cut 14 days from the average amount of time it takes <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/08/27/federal-employers-cut-time-for-processing-complaints-report-finds/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/08/27/federal-employers-cut-time-for-processing-complaints-report-finds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed White House budget outlines legal priorities&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/03/01/white-house-budget-outlines-legal-priorities/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/03/01/white-house-budget-outlines-legal-priorities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/03/01/white-house-budget-outlines-legal-priorities/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-55697" title="whitehouse" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files//srv/www/lwusa/releases/20100204182108/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files//2010/02/whitehouse.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="133" />WASHINGTON – The proposed fiscal 2013 budget released by the White House in February outlines a number of the administration’s priorities related to lawyers, from an increase in enforcement of federal employment and labor laws to more focused attention on food <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/03/01/white-house-budget-outlines-legal-priorities/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/03/01/white-house-budget-outlines-legal-priorities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal agencies launch radon reduction program&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/07/08/federal-agencies-launch-radon-reduction-program/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/07/08/federal-agencies-launch-radon-reduction-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Health and Human Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lung cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/07/08/federal-agencies-launch-radon-reduction-program/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON – Citing radon as a leading cause of non-smoking-related lung cancer, which leads to about 21,000 deaths each year, more than a half dozen federal agencies have joined in an effort to reduce exposure to the radioactive element. </p> <p>The Federal Radon Action Plan is designed to provide outreach <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/07/08/federal-agencies-launch-radon-reduction-program/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/07/08/federal-agencies-launch-radon-reduction-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Headaches for lawyers averted with budget deal&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/04/11/headaches-for-lawyers-averted-with-budget-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/04/11/headaches-for-lawyers-averted-with-budget-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shutdown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/04/11/headaches-for-lawyers-averted-with-budget-deal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files/2010/05/deadline-clock.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-68998" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files/2010/05/deadline-clock.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="150" /></a>WASHINGTON &#8211; Just hours before the U.S. government was set to shut down due to a lack of funding, Washington lawmakers agreed to a short-term budget plan Friday night, ensuring that courtrooms and agencies crucial to lawyers will remain open for <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/04/11/headaches-for-lawyers-averted-with-budget-deal/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/04/11/headaches-for-lawyers-averted-with-budget-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government shutdown would halt systems critical to lawyers&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/04/08/government-shutdown-would-halt-systems-critical-to-lawyers/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/04/08/government-shutdown-would-halt-systems-critical-to-lawyers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 20:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government shutdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLRB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SBA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/04/08/government-shutdown-would-halt-systems-critical-to-lawyers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The budget impasse and resulting government shutdown would have widespread effects on systems critical to attorneys, slowing some courtroom and agency operations while bringing others to a screeching halt.</p> <p><strong>Federal courts</strong></p> <p>According to the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts in Washington, federal courts have enough non-appropriated fees to keep <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/04/08/government-shutdown-would-halt-systems-critical-to-lawyers/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/04/08/government-shutdown-would-halt-systems-critical-to-lawyers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
