<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawyers USA Online &#187; Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/tag/facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com</link>
	<description>Your Business Partner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:05:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Benchmarks: Lawyer breaks rules by posting prosecutor’s video on YouTube&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/02/benchmarks-lawyer-breaks-rules-by-posting-prosecutors-video-on-youtube/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/02/benchmarks-lawyer-breaks-rules-by-posting-prosecutors-video-on-youtube/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 15:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An Illinois criminal defense lawyer thought he would expose shady police tactics by posting a video of an undercover drug buy on YouTube.</p> <p>Unfortunately, the only thing the lawyer managed to do was incur the wrath of Illinois courts for misusing prosecution evidence disclosed during discovery in his client’s case.</p> <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/02/benchmarks-lawyer-breaks-rules-by-posting-prosecutors-video-on-youtube/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/02/benchmarks-lawyer-breaks-rules-by-posting-prosecutors-video-on-youtube/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benchmarks: Judge OKs service of foreign defendants via Facebook&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/03/29/benchmarks-judge-oks-service-of-foreign-defendants-via-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/03/29/benchmarks-judge-oks-service-of-foreign-defendants-via-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[due process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hague Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service of process]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Experts say a recent decision by a New York federal judge marks a trend towards innovation in overcoming the challenges of serving parties outside the U.S.</p> <p>District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in March granted the Federal Trade Commission’s motion to use Facebook as an alternative means of effecting service of <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/03/29/benchmarks-judge-oks-service-of-foreign-defendants-via-facebook/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/03/29/benchmarks-judge-oks-service-of-foreign-defendants-via-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EEOC sanctioned for delaying social media discovery&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/03/15/eeoc-sanctioned-for-delaying-social-media-discovery/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/03/15/eeoc-sanctioned-for-delaying-social-media-discovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equal Employment Opportunity Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=91904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A Colorado federal court has sanctioned the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for delaying an employer’s efforts to discover the emails, texts and blog posts of employees seeking damages for sexual harassment.</p> <p>“In certain respects, the EEOC has been negligent in its discovery obligations, dilatory in cooperating with defense counsel, and <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/03/15/eeoc-sanctioned-for-delaying-social-media-discovery/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/03/15/eeoc-sanctioned-for-delaying-social-media-discovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LegalTech 2013: from settlement predictions to social network tracking&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/19/legaltech-2013-from-settlement-predictions-to-social-network-tracking/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/19/legaltech-2013-from-settlement-predictions-to-social-network-tracking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Correy Stephenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CLE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer-assisted review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronically stored information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LegalTech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[practice management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictive coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=91394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawyers USA reports on items of interest to solos and small firm attorneys from the annual LegalTech conference, including software that can predict where a case will settle.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/19/legaltech-2013-from-settlement-predictions-to-social-network-tracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six states now prohibit employer, educator social media access&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/14/six-states-now-prohibit-employer-educator-social-media-access/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/14/six-states-now-prohibit-employer-educator-social-media-access/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Correy Stephenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=90560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Six states now prohibit employers or educational institutions from requiring employees or students to provide access to their social media accounts: California, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan and New Jersey.</p> <p>Last year, <a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/03/29/employer-request-for-facebook-passwords-yields-legislation-investigation/"><strong>news reports</strong></a> claimed that employers and schools were requiring prospective and current employees and students to provide access <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/14/six-states-now-prohibit-employer-educator-social-media-access/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/14/six-states-now-prohibit-employer-educator-social-media-access/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ownership of digital assets concern for estate planners&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/03/ownership-of-digital-assets-concern-for-estate-planners/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/03/ownership-of-digital-assets-concern-for-estate-planners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 14:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Correy Stephenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=90333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-81453" title="20-Q-socialmedia" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files/2011/11/20-Q-socialmedia.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="133" />So much of an individual’s life now appears online, including bills, Facebook accounts and photo-sharing websites. But what happens to those assets when a person dies?</p> <p>It should be standard practice for lawyers to advise clients to include digital assets in <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/03/ownership-of-digital-assets-concern-for-estate-planners/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/03/ownership-of-digital-assets-concern-for-estate-planners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defamation case exposes social media controversy&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/27/defamation-case-exposes-social-media-controversy/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/27/defamation-case-exposes-social-media-controversy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 22:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrongful termination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=90192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-80406" title="line-of-cars" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files/2011/09/line-of-cars.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="133" />A Massachusetts judge’s refusal to issue an injunction in a suit involving a car dealership allegedly defamed by the relatives of an ex-employee demonstrates the struggle for courts that are asked to strike a balance between the First Amendment and social <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/27/defamation-case-exposes-social-media-controversy/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/27/defamation-case-exposes-social-media-controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Improving your firm’s social media presence&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/11/26/improving-your-firms-social-media-presence/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/11/26/improving-your-firms-social-media-presence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Ogden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Special Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Month's Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20 Things Lawyers Need to Know in 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law firm marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=89305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-89399" title="social-media" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files/2012/11/social-media.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="133" />Given the current explosion of social media use, it’s more important than ever for lawyers and their firms to be part of the conversation.</p> <p>“Our future clients are communicating this way,” said Stephanie Kimbro, author of <strong><a href="http://virtuallawpractice.org/">Virtual Law Practice</a>.</strong></p> <p>Lawyers <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/11/26/improving-your-firms-social-media-presence/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/11/26/improving-your-firms-social-media-presence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Courts weigh in on social media discovery requests&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/11/19/courts-weigh-in-on-social-media-discovery-requests/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/11/19/courts-weigh-in-on-social-media-discovery-requests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Correy Stephenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Month's Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trial Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Rules of Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Depot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=89240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-87816" title="facebook-like" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files/2012/09/facebook-like.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="133" />Lawyers still making their way along the learning curve of social media evidence may struggle to find guidance from court opinions.</p> <p>But two recent decisions with different results offer some clues on how to narrowly focus a discovery request to pass <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/11/19/courts-weigh-in-on-social-media-discovery-requests/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/11/19/courts-weigh-in-on-social-media-discovery-requests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$9.5M deal in Facebook class action deemed ‘adequate’&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/09/24/9-5m-deal-in-facebook-class-action-deemed-adequate/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/09/24/9-5m-deal-in-facebook-class-action-deemed-adequate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Privacy Protection Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=87831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-12468" title="employees18" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files//srv/www/lwusa/releases/20091210164057/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files//2010/01/employees18.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="133" />A $9.5 million settlement of a consumer class action against Facebook was sufficiently adequate to be approved, even if it represented only a fraction of what some class members claimed they could recover in individual lawsuits, the 9th Circuit has ruled <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/09/24/9-5m-deal-in-facebook-class-action-deemed-adequate/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/09/24/9-5m-deal-in-facebook-class-action-deemed-adequate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
