<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawyers USA Online &#187; Exxon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/tag/exxon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com</link>
	<description>Your Business Partner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:39:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Exxon escapes $17.5M asbestos judgment&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/24/exxon-escapes-17-5m-asbestos-judgment/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/24/exxon-escapes-17-5m-asbestos-judgment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=90888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An asbestos defendant should have been permitted to introduce evidence that it had no duty to intervene to protect the plaintiff because of the safety programs implemented by the plaintiff’s employer, the Virginia Supreme Court has ruled in reversing a $17.5 million judgment.</p> <p>The plaintiff worked at a shipyard from <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/24/exxon-escapes-17-5m-asbestos-judgment/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/24/exxon-escapes-17-5m-asbestos-judgment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homeowners can’t recover damages for cancer fears&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/13/homeowners-can%e2%80%99t-recover-damages-for-cancer-fears/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/13/homeowners-can%e2%80%99t-recover-damages-for-cancer-fears/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emotional distress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MTBE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/13/homeowners-can%e2%80%99t-recover-damages-for-cancer-fears/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Certain residents in the vicinity of a massive gasoline leak could not recover damages for their fear of contracting cancer from toxic chemicals released into their groundwater, a Maryland appellate court has ruled in an en banc decision.</p> <p>The plaintiffs are members of 88 households in the vicinity of an <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/13/homeowners-can%e2%80%99t-recover-damages-for-cancer-fears/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/13/homeowners-can%e2%80%99t-recover-damages-for-cancer-fears/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exxon hit with $1 billion in punitive damages&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/07/01/exxon-hit-with-1-billion-in-punitive-damages/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/07/01/exxon-hit-with-1-billion-in-punitive-damages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Jacobs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Month's Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gasoline leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punitive damages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/07/01/exxon-hit-with-1-billion-in-punitive-damages/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exxon Mobil Corp. has been hit with $1 billion in punitive damages for a 2006 gasoline leak in rural Baltimore County, Md., sources close to the litigation said Thursday.

That’s in addition to about $495 million in compensatory damage awards that were made public Wednesday.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/07/01/exxon-hit-with-1-billion-in-punitive-damages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jury awards $25 million in asbestos suit against Exxon&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/03/23/jury-awards-25-million-in-asbestos-suit-against-exxon/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/03/23/jury-awards-25-million-in-asbestos-suit-against-exxon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/03/23/jury-awards-25-million-in-asbestos-suit-against-exxon/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A Virginia jury has awarded $25 million to a ship repair coordinator who had contracted mesothelioma after working on oil tankers for years.</p> <p>The predecessors of Exxon Mobil, the defendant in the case, had taken steps to protect their refinery workers from the dangers of asbestos since the 1930s.</p> <p>But <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/03/23/jury-awards-25-million-in-asbestos-suit-against-exxon/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/03/23/jury-awards-25-million-in-asbestos-suit-against-exxon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jury delivers $25 million verdict against Exxon in asbestos case&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/03/18/jury-delivers-25-million-verdict-against-exxon-in-asbestos-case/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/03/18/jury-delivers-25-million-verdict-against-exxon-in-asbestos-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 14:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Ogden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/03/18/jury-delivers-25-million-verdict-against-exxon-in-asbestos-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A Newport News, Va. Circuit Court jury has hit oil giant Exxon Mobil with a $25 million verdict in an asbestos lawsuit brought by a former shipyard worker &#8212; among the largest jury verdicts ever handed down in a Virginia personal injury case. </p> <p>Read the full article from the <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/03/18/jury-delivers-25-million-verdict-against-exxon-in-asbestos-case/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/03/18/jury-delivers-25-million-verdict-against-exxon-in-asbestos-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill would reverse Exxon ruling limiting punitives&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/06/02/bill-would-reverse-exxon-ruling-limiting-punitives/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/06/02/bill-would-reverse-exxon-ruling-limiting-punitives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 20:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Month's Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maritime law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punitive damages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=69929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files/2010/06/exxon.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-69937" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files/2010/06/exxon.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="120" /></a>WASHINGTON &#8211; As oil from the massive spill in the Gulf of Mexico continues to spread, lawmakers have introduced legislation that would lift the cap on punitive damages that can be assessed against those responsible for such disasters under maritime law.</p> <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/06/02/bill-would-reverse-exxon-ruling-limiting-punitives/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></img>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/06/02/bill-would-reverse-exxon-ruling-limiting-punitives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pitfalls abound for Gulf oil spill plaintiffs&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/05/05/pitfalls-abound-for-gulf-oil-spill-plaintiffs/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/05/05/pitfalls-abound-for-gulf-oil-spill-plaintiffs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 12:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Pollution Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil spill litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=68807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files/2010/05/bp_logo.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-68855" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files/2010/05/bp_logo.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="150" /></a>As coastal businesses and governments brace for the full effects of the massive petroleum spill off the Gulf Coast, the legal landscape for those seeking civil damages from oil company BP may be as slippery as the oil slick itself.</p> <p>That&#8217;s <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/05/05/pitfalls-abound-for-gulf-oil-spill-plaintiffs/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/05/05/pitfalls-abound-for-gulf-oil-spill-plaintiffs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
