Quantcast

State expert could testify on delayed DUI test (access required)

Published: May 14, 2012

Tags: ,

The state should be permitted to offer expert testimony explaining retrograde extrapolation to establish that a DUI defendant’s blood alcohol content was over .08 at the time he was driving, the Oregon Supreme Court has ruled in reversing a pretrial order.

Expert couldn’t testify on reliability of confession (access required)

Published: April 2, 2012

Tags: ,

A child sex abuse defendant could not introduce an expert to testify regarding the reliability of confessions that she later claimed were involuntary, New York’s highest court has ruled in affirming a conviction.

At the class certification stage, a harder look at experts (access required)

By: Kimberly Atkins
Published: February 16, 2012

Tags: , , , , ,

WASHINGTON – In the year since the U.S. Supreme Court made it tougher for large groups of plaintiffs to prove that they should proceed in a class action, courts have been taking a harder look at a key type of evidence plaintiffs use to make that case: expert witness testimony.

E-monitoring data admissible in drunk driving case (access required)

Published: July 22, 2011

Tags: ,

Prosecutors didn’t need expert testimony in order to introduce electronic monitoring records to prove that a defendant drove while intoxicated, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has ruled in affirming a conviction.

Expert on eyewitnesses may testify (access required)

Published: April 20, 2011

Tags: ,

A carjacking defendant may be allowed to introduce an expert witness on the unreliability of eyewitness identification, the D.C. Court of Appeals has ruled in reversing a conviction.

Expert can testify on abuse victim’s mental injuries (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: March 1, 2011

Tags: , ,

An alleged victim of clergy sex abuse should have been allowed to introduce expert testimony on the general cause of his mental injuries, the Delaware Supreme Court has ruled in granting a new trial.

Expert testimony on grill fire excluded (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: February 28, 2011

Tags: , , , ,

A product liability plaintiff could not introduce test results that purportedly demonstrated the scientific principles underlying his expert’s theory on how a propane gas grill caused a house fire, the 8th Circuit has ruled in affirming summary judgment.

‘Human factors’ expert excluded in auto defect case (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: December 20, 2010

Tags: , ,

A product liability plaintiff could not establish that an automobile gear shift was defectively designed based solely on the testimony of a “human factors” engineer, the 10th Circuit has ruled in affirming judgment.

Defense experts could testify in LASIK case (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: October 20, 2010

Tags: , ,

Defense experts in a LASIK case could testify that the plaintiff’s nighttime vision problems were not a predicable outcome of her eye surgery, an Illinois appellate court has ruled in affirming a defense verdict.

Expert can’t testify on multiple-chemical sensitivity (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: October 19, 2010

Tags: ,

An expert witness did not have a sufficiently reliable scientific basis to testify that a plaintiff’s illness was caused by her exposure to epoxy paint in her office, the Kansas Supreme Court has ruled in affirming a summary judgment.

Sign-up for alerts

NEW FREE WHITE PAPER: E-Discovery

This FREE e-report brought to you by Lawyers USA contains the latest tips for conducting thorough and successful electronic discovery for your trial in 2012. We’ve analyzed the latest court rulings and trends in e-discovery to help you and your clients avoid sanctions and win your case.

Click here to get your free White Paper today!