<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawyers USA Online &#187; estate planning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/tag/estate-planning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com</link>
	<description>Your Business Partner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Estate can’t sue lawyer for negligent tax planning&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/03/13/estate-cant-sue-lawyer-for-negligent-tax-planning/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/03/13/estate-cant-sue-lawyer-for-negligent-tax-planning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=91881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The administrator of a client’s estate could not maintain a legal malpractice action for alleged negligent estate planning that resulted in increased tax liability, the Kansas Supreme Court has ruled in affirming judgment.</p> <p>The defendant provided estate planning services for a wealthy client. The defendant’s asset protection strategy consisted of <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/03/13/estate-cant-sue-lawyer-for-negligent-tax-planning/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/03/13/estate-cant-sue-lawyer-for-negligent-tax-planning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Higher tax rates on trust income mean more work for lawyers&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/28/higher-tax-rates-on-trust-income-mean-more-work-for-lawyers/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/28/higher-tax-rates-on-trust-income-mean-more-work-for-lawyers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 22:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia Hsieh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trusts and estates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=91664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the aftermath of the fiscal cliff deal, trusts now face much higher taxes on income.</p> <p>The top tax rate increased from 35 percent to 39.6 percent and a new Medicare surtax of 3.8 percent on investment income was imposed on top earners as of January 1.</p> <p>But while the <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/28/higher-tax-rates-on-trust-income-mean-more-work-for-lawyers/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/28/higher-tax-rates-on-trust-income-mean-more-work-for-lawyers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New landscape for estate planning attorneys&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/10/below-the-fiscal-cliff-new-landscape-for-estate-planning-attorneys/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/10/below-the-fiscal-cliff-new-landscape-for-estate-planning-attorneys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia Hsieh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate tax exemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gift tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trusts and estates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=90486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-77939" title="us-capitol-building" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files//2011/04/us-capitol-building.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="133" />The new law that averted the “fiscal cliff” contains major changes for estate and gift tax rules that will affect not only the advice lawyers give to their clients, but the future landscape of estate planning law for years to come.</p> <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/10/below-the-fiscal-cliff-new-landscape-for-estate-planning-attorneys/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></img>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/10/below-the-fiscal-cliff-new-landscape-for-estate-planning-attorneys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ownership of digital assets concern for estate planners&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/03/ownership-of-digital-assets-concern-for-estate-planners/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/03/ownership-of-digital-assets-concern-for-estate-planners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 14:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Correy Stephenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=90333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-81453" title="20-Q-socialmedia" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files/2011/11/20-Q-socialmedia.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="133" />So much of an individual’s life now appears online, including bills, Facebook accounts and photo-sharing websites. But what happens to those assets when a person dies?</p> <p>It should be standard practice for lawyers to advise clients to include digital assets in <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/03/ownership-of-digital-assets-concern-for-estate-planners/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/03/ownership-of-digital-assets-concern-for-estate-planners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trust beneficiaries have standing to sue trustee&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/26/trust-beneficiaries-have-standing-to-sue-trustee/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/26/trust-beneficiaries-have-standing-to-sue-trustee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of fiduciary duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revocable trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trusts and estates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=90142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The beneficiaries of a revocable trust had standing to sue the trustee for breach of fiduciary duty allegedly committed while the settlor was alive, the California Supreme Court has ruled in reversing judgment.</p> <p>The defendant’s father created a revocable trust, naming the defendant as trustee. The father was the sole <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/26/trust-beneficiaries-have-standing-to-sue-trustee/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/26/trust-beneficiaries-have-standing-to-sue-trustee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Year brings more uncertainty over estate tax&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/18/new-year-brings-more-uncertainty-over-estate-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/18/new-year-brings-more-uncertainty-over-estate-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Month's Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=89993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files//srv/www/lwusa/releases/20091210164057/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files//2010/01/estatetax.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-12378" title="estatetax" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files//srv/www/lwusa/releases/20091210164057/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files//2010/01/estatetax.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="130" /></a>WASHINGTON – As the budgetary wrangling between the White House and Congress continues, the only thing that is clear is that an agreement on long-term estate tax reform is unlikely. That means federal estate tax rate hikes and the loss <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/18/new-year-brings-more-uncertainty-over-estate-tax/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/18/new-year-brings-more-uncertainty-over-estate-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawyer didn’t forfeit malpractice coverage&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/11/15/lawyer-didnt-forfeit-malpractice-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/11/15/lawyer-didnt-forfeit-malpractice-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Month's Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malpractice insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=89198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A lawyer didn’t violate a condition of his malpractice insurance coverage by admitting that he had made a mistake in drafting a will, the Illinois Appellate Court has ruled in affirming judgment.</p> <p>The lawyer provided estate planning services to an elderly woman. After the woman died, the lawyer realized that <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/11/15/lawyer-didnt-forfeit-malpractice-coverage/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/11/15/lawyer-didnt-forfeit-malpractice-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Annuity didn’t render patient ineligible for Medicaid&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/04/annuity-didnt-render-patient-ineligible-for-medicaid/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/04/annuity-didnt-render-patient-ineligible-for-medicaid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 12:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annuity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trusts and estates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=88201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A non-assignable annuity contract that provided income to the spouse of a nursing home patient did not count as an excess resource that needed to be spent down for the patient’s Medicaid eligibility, the 2nd Circuit has ruled in affirming judgment.</p> <p>The plaintiff filed an application for Medicaid benefits with <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/04/annuity-didnt-render-patient-ineligible-for-medicaid/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/04/annuity-didnt-render-patient-ineligible-for-medicaid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State AGs weigh in against DOMA&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/09/18/state-ags-weigh-in-against-doma/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/09/18/state-ags-weigh-in-against-doma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Correy Stephenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual orientation discrimination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=87691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The 2nd Circuit should strike down the Defense of Marriage Act as an unconstitutional violation of the equal protection rights of same-sex couples, a trio of state Attorneys General argues in a new brief.</p> <p>The case, <em>Windsor v. U.S</em>, involves Edie Windsor and Thea Spyer, a same-sex couple who married <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/09/18/state-ags-weigh-in-against-doma/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/09/18/state-ags-weigh-in-against-doma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Estate planning app launches&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/08/30/estate-planning-app-launches/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/08/30/estate-planning-app-launches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Correy Stephenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Your Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=87261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There really is an app for everything – even estate planning.</p> <p>A tech company has released an estate planning app which allows attorneys to customize an application that clients can use to manage their estates.</p> <p>App Order executive director Trev Gore said that for $1,200 the company can re-format its <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/08/30/estate-planning-app-launches/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/08/30/estate-planning-app-launches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
