State pays $4.25M to exonerated inmate 
Published: July 12, 2010
Tags: DNA, New York, wrongful imprisonment
An attorney says that New York state is paying $4.25 million in compensation to a Buffalo, N.Y., man who spent 22 years in prison for two rapes committed by someone else.
State can test cup in detainee’s cell for DNA 
Published: May 5, 2010
Tags: DNA, Fourth Amendment, search and seizure
Obtaining an abandoned cup used by a detainee in a holding cell and testing it for DNA did not violate the Fourth Amendment, Maryland’s highest court has ruled.
Arrest warrant may be based on DNA profile 
Published: January 26, 2010
Tags: DNA, search and seizure
An unknown suspect’s unique DNA profile satisfied the “particularity” requirement for the issuance of an arrest warrant, the California Supreme Court has ruled in affirming a conviction.
Suit challenges California’s mandatory DNA sampling 
Published: October 13, 2009
Tags: DNA, Proposition 69
A class action filed by the American Civil Liberties Union challenges California’s mandatory DNA sampling of anyone arrested for a felony regardless of whether they are ever charged or convicted.
Forcible DNA testing unconstitutional 
Published: June 24, 2009
Tags: DNA, search and seizure
A forcible buccal swab from a pretrial detainee for DNA sampling violated the Fourth Amendment, the 9th Circuit has ruled in reversing a U.S. District Court.
High Court says no constitutional right to DNA testing 
By Sylvia Hsieh -
Published: June 18, 2009
Tags: DNA, §1983
A criminal defendant does not have a constitutional right to DNA testing after conviction, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in a 5-4 decision.
Ruling allowing Taser use to get DNA may be nation’s first 
Published: June 4, 2009
Tags: DNA, Taser
It is legally permissible for police to zap a suspect with a Taser to obtain a DNA sample, as long as it’s not done “maliciously, or to an excessive extent, or with resulting injury,” a county judge has ruled in the first case of its kind in New York State, and possibly the nation.
HABEAS CORPUS 
Published: March 31, 2009
Tags: DNA, habeas corpus
On federal habeas review, was the evidence underlying a defendant’s conviction for sexual assault, which included faulty DNA evidence, clearly insufficient under Jackson v. Virginia?
U.S. Supreme Court. McDaniel v. Brown, No. 08-559. Certiorari granted Jan. 26, 2009. Ruling below: 525 F.3d 787 (9th Cir. 2008).
FREE White Papers
Most Viewed Stories
Stay Connected with Lawyers USA
Lawyers USA keeps you connected with all the latest news affecting you and your practice with Daily, Practice and Breaking News alerts.
To Sign-up or Manage your Alerts, click here.
