<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawyers USA Online &#187; Discrimination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/tag/discrimination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com</link>
	<description>Your Business Partner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:49:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Workplace bias charges down slightly, EEOC says&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/01/workplace-bias-charges-down-slightly-eeoc-says/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/01/workplace-bias-charges-down-slightly-eeoc-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia Hsieh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equal Employment Opportunity Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systemic discrimination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=91042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Workplace discrimination charges went down slightly in fiscal year 2012, according to year-end data released by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.</p> <p>The total number of job bias charges was nearly 100,000, and the most frequently filed claims were retaliation, followed by race discrimination and then sex discrimination.</p> <p>During this time, <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/01/workplace-bias-charges-down-slightly-eeoc-says/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/01/workplace-bias-charges-down-slightly-eeoc-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank of America settles LGBT discrimination claim&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/01/bank-of-america-settles-lgbt-discrimination-claim/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/01/bank-of-america-settles-lgbt-discrimination-claim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 12:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Housing and Urban Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equal Access Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual orientation discrimination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=91034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Bank of America will pay $7,500 to settle the first action to enforce the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s new rule prohibiting home lenders from discriminating based on sexual orientation or gender identity.</p> <p>“This agreement demonstrates that HUD will vigorously enforce its Equal Access Rule and pursue lenders <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/01/bank-of-america-settles-lgbt-discrimination-claim/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/01/bank-of-america-settles-lgbt-discrimination-claim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attorney’s lawsuit against ex-firm is dismissed&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/24/attorneys-lawsuit-against-ex-firm-is-dismissed/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/24/attorneys-lawsuit-against-ex-firm-is-dismissed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia Hsieh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=90891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An attorney’s race discrimination suit against law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &#38; Sullivan has been dismissed on summary judgment by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.</p> <p>Kisshia Simmons-Grant, a former contract attorney for the firm, alleged that she was assigned less lucrative work than other <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/24/attorneys-lawsuit-against-ex-firm-is-dismissed/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/24/attorneys-lawsuit-against-ex-firm-is-dismissed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gov’t can’t be sued for breaching employee’s settlement&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/07/govt-cant-be-sued-for-breaching-employees-settlement/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/07/govt-cant-be-sued-for-breaching-employees-settlement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 18:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sovereign immunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=90400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The federal government could not be sued for breaching the terms of an agreement settling an employee’s Title VII discrimination claims, the 6th Circuit has ruled in affirming a dismissal.</p> <p>The plaintiff is an employee of the IRS.  After being denied a promotion, she filed a discrimination complaint with the <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/07/govt-cant-be-sued-for-breaching-employees-settlement/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/07/govt-cant-be-sued-for-breaching-employees-settlement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navy chaplains can sue for discrimination&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/11/05/navy-chaplains-can-sue-for-discrimination/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/11/05/navy-chaplains-can-sue-for-discrimination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 21:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[establishment clause]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=88965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Military chaplains from certain Protestant denominations have standing to sue the U.S. Navy for the discriminatory denial of promotions, the D.C. Circuit has ruled in reversing judgment.</p> <p>The plaintiffs are current and former military chaplains who belong to certain Protestant denominations that follow no formal liturgy in worship services. According <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/11/05/navy-chaplains-can-sue-for-discrimination/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/11/05/navy-chaplains-can-sue-for-discrimination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart faces new class action by temp workers&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/30/wal-mart-faces-new-class-action-by-temp-workers/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/30/wal-mart-faces-new-class-action-by-temp-workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia Hsieh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Month's Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overtime litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wage and hour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=88864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-88880" title="wal-mart" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files/2012/10/wal-mart.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="133" />Temporary workers at Wal-Mart have filed a new class action against the retail giant.</p> <p>The lawsuit, filed in Illinois federal court, alleges that the company violated wage and overtime laws by requiring temporary employees to show up early for work, stay <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/30/wal-mart-faces-new-class-action-by-temp-workers/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/30/wal-mart-faces-new-class-action-by-temp-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netflix settles online ADA suit&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/19/netflix-settles-online-ada-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/19/netflix-settles-online-ada-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Correy Stephenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[closed captioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public accommodation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=88656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-85944" title="netflix" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files/2012/07/netflix.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="133" />A closely watched case that grappled with the issue of the application of the Americans with Disabilities Act to the Internet has settled.</p> <p>In June, U.S. District Court Judge Michael Ponsor held that <a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/08/13/where-the-ada-and-the-internet-meet/"><strong>the Internet is a place of public <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/19/netflix-settles-online-ada-suit/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></strong></a></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/19/netflix-settles-online-ada-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Famed ADA lawyer sued for sexual harassment&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/11/famed-ada-lawyer-sued-for-sexual-harassment/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/11/famed-ada-lawyer-sued-for-sexual-harassment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 19:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex harassment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=88426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A quadriplegic California lawyer who has gained notoriety by suing thousands of businesses for disability discrimination is himself facing a lawsuit brought by four former employees who are accusing him of sexual harassment.</p> <p>A <a title="lawsuit" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/wp-files/pdfs-4/doeuk-v-johnson.pdf"><strong>lawsuit</strong></a> filed in Sacramento Superior Court alleges that Carmichael, Calif. attorney Scott Johnson forced <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/11/famed-ada-lawyer-sued-for-sexual-harassment/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/11/famed-ada-lawyer-sued-for-sexual-harassment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill aims to end LGBT bias in federal jury selection&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/01/bill-aims-to-end-lgbt-bias-in-jury-selection/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/01/bill-aims-to-end-lgbt-bias-in-jury-selection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 20:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fedearl courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jury selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual orientation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=88115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-40126" title="jury3" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files//srv/www/lwusa/releases/20100120185514/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files//2010/01/jury3.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="133" />WASHINGTON – A bill that would prohibit discrimination against gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgendered individuals in the federal jury selection process has been introduced in the Senate.</p> <p>The measure, called the Jury Access for Capable Citizens and Equality in Service Selection, <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/01/bill-aims-to-end-lgbt-bias-in-jury-selection/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/01/bill-aims-to-end-lgbt-bias-in-jury-selection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homeless group awarded $1 million&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/09/17/homeless-group-awarded-1-million/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/09/17/homeless-group-awarded-1-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Ogden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[age discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=87605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A federal jury has ordered the city of Boise to pay $1 million to an organization that helps homeless people because the city discriminated against women and children and retaliated against the organization when board members complained.</p> <p>Read the full article from <em>The Associated Press</em>: <strong><a href="http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2012/sep/14/homeless-group-awarded-1-million/">Homeless group awarded $1 million</a></strong></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/09/17/homeless-group-awarded-1-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
