Quantcast

Justices agree to hear Defense of Marriage Act case (access required)

Published: December 7, 2012

Tags: , , ,

The justices of the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in a challenge to the federal law defining marriage as between a man and a woman, but also hinted that the case could be decided on procedural grounds without reaching the merits.

Government asks justices to consider DOMA case (access required)

Published: October 30, 2012

Tags: , , ,

The Solicitor General is urging the U.S. Supreme Court to ignore the front of the line in the Defense of Marriage Act petitions for certiorari and instead agree to hear the last one filed.

DOMA violates equal protection (access required)

Published: October 19, 2012

Tags: , , ,

The federal law defining marriage as a union between one man and one woman violates equal protection, the 2nd Circuit has ruled in affirming judgment.

State AGs weigh in against DOMA (access required)

Published: September 18, 2012

Tags: , , , , , , ,

The 2nd Circuit should strike down the Defense of Marriage Act as an unconstitutional violation of the equal protection rights of same-sex couples, a trio of state Attorneys General argues in a new brief.

House lawmakers send DOMA case to Supreme Court (access required)

By: Kimberly Atkins
Published: July 2, 2012

Tags: , , , ,

WASHINGTON – House Republicans, who vowed last year to defend federal challenges to the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act after the Justice Department announced it would no longer do so, have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to take up the issue.

1st circuit: Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional (access required)

Published: May 31, 2012

Tags: , ,

The federal Defense of Marriage Act violates principles of equal protection and federalism under the U.S. Constitution, the 1st Circuit has ruled.

High-profile 1st Circuit DOMA challenge packs courtroom (access required)

By: Dan McDonald
Published: April 9, 2012

Tags: , , ,

The 1st Circuit heard arguments last week in the legal challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act, a federal law that bars same-sex married couples from marital protections.

The plaintiffs in Gill v. Office of Personnel Management are state residents represented by Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders. The plaintiffs allege they have been harmed by the federal government, which, under DOMA, has refused to recognize their marriages, meaning that they do not have access to Social Security protections, family health insurance policies or joint income tax filings.

Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional (access required)

Published: February 28, 2012

Tags: , ,

The federal Defense of Marriage Act could not be enforced to deny a federal employee the right to have her same-sex spouse covered under her health insurance plan, a U.S. District Court in California has ruled in granting summary judgment.

ABA declares support for repeal of DOMA (access required)

Published: November 8, 2011

Tags: , , ,

The American Bar Association is throwing its support behind legislation that would repeal the federal Defense of Marriage Act.

DOJ won’t appeal same-sex bankruptcy filings (access required)

Published: July 13, 2011

Tags: , , ,

The Department of Justice will no longer appeal joint petitions filed by legally married same-sex partners, the agency has announced.

Sign-up for alerts