Quantcast

Class-action ruling leaves unanswered questions (access required)

By: Kimberly Atkins
Published: April 2, 2013

Tags: , , , , ,

WASHINGTON – It was a closely watched case that came to a dramatic and unexpected conclusion of questionable precedential value. Now attorneys are left pondering what effect, if any, the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend will have on class-action certifications.

Defendant can’t introduce fMRI lie detection results (access required)

Published: September 14, 2012

Tags: , , , , ,

A criminal defendant could not introduce results from a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) lie detection test to prove the veracity of his denials of wrongdoing, the 6th Circuit has ruled.

Seatbelt expert couldn’t testify in Ford rollover case (access required)

Published: August 22, 2012

Tags: , , , , , ,

An expert in a product liability case was not qualified to testify that the plaintiff’s injuries were caused by a defective seatbelt buckle in a Ford automobile, the 10th Circuit has ruled in reversing a $4.5 million judgment.

Prempro expert could testify regarding short-term use (access required)

Published: July 30, 2012

Tags: , , , , ,

Product liability plaintiffs should have been permitted to introduce expert testimony linking the short-term use of Prempro to a risk of breast cancer, the 8th Circuit has ruled in reversing a summary judgment.

Manual gives judges revised help with scientific evidence (access required)

By: Correy Stephenson
Published: July 12, 2012

Tags: , , ,

The third edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence has been released, providing a revised roadmap for judges in evaluating whether scientific evidence is admissible.

For lawyers, the manual gives a framework for what judges will be focusing on during evidentiary hearings.

TASA report reveals challenges to expert testimony (access required)

Published: June 22, 2011

Tags: , ,

The TASA Group has released the second iteration of The Challenge History Report™.

Expert can testify on benzene-leukemia link (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: March 23, 2011

Tags: , , , ,

An expert had an adequate scientific basis to testify that a plaintiff’s leukemia was caused by his routine workplace exposure to the defendants’ benzene-containing products, the 1st Circuit has ruled in reversing judgment.

$20.5M verdict for welder overturned (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: September 9, 2010

Tags: , ,

An expert witness didn’t have a reliable scientific basis to testify that fumes from welding products were the cause of a form of Parkinson’s Disease suffered by a plaintiff, the 6th Circuit has ruled.

Vaccine Act plaintiffs can’t show autism link (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: August 31, 2010

Tags: , , ,

Plaintiffs who filed a claim for compensation under the federal Vaccine Act could not show that their daughter’s autism was the result of a measles vaccine she received as an infant, the Federal Circuit has ruled.

Autism evidence inadmissible in brain injury case (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: June 24, 2010

Tags: , , ,

A product liability plaintiff could not introduce expert testimony to show that her son’s autism was the result of brain injuries suffered when the defendant’s child safety seat allegedly failed, the 11th Circuit has ruled in affirming a dismissal.

Sign-up for alerts