Quantcast

Attorney fees improperly limited in Title VII case (access required)

Published: December 21, 2011

Tags: , , ,

A district court improperly relied on an employee’s contingency fee agreement in limiting the amount of attorney fees to be awarded in her Title VII retaliation suit, the 7th Circuit has ruled in reversing judgment.

Fee agreement unenforceable against minor (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: April 5, 2011

Tags: ,

An attorney could not enforce a contingent fee agreement executed by a parent on behalf of an injured child, the Tennessee Supreme Court has ruled.

Insurance doesn’t cover lawyer’s fee dispute (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: March 31, 2011

Tags: ,

An attorney’s professional liability policy does not cover a dispute with his former firm over a division of contingent fees, a U.S. District Court in Massachusetts has ruled in granting a summary judgment.

Attorney fees in Social Security case reduced to prevent ‘windfall’ (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: October 1, 2010

Tags: , ,

A federal judge could apply the lodestar method to determine that a lawyer’s contingency fee in a Social Security case was unreasonable and subject to reduction as a “windfall,” the 5th Circuit has ruled in affirming judgment.

Contingent fee reduced (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: August 31, 2010

Tags: ,

A law firm could be required to refund a portion of a contingent fee that was deemed “unreasonable” based on events that occurred after the client executed her retainer agreement, the Colorado Court of Appeal has ruled in affirming judgment.

Cities may pay outside counsel’s contingent fee (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: July 28, 2010

Tags: , , ,

Local governments may retain outside counsel on a contingent-fee basis, so long as they work under the supervision and control of government attorneys, the California Supreme Court has ruled.

Court can’t slash contingent fee award (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: May 19, 2010

Tags: ,

A district court impermissibly reduced the contingent fees earned by counsel in obtaining an $18 million personal injury settlement from 33 to 3 percent, the 4th Circuit has ruled in reversing judgment.

Referring attorney can be denied fee (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: February 21, 2010

Tags: , ,

A referring attorney in a child injury case could be denied a contingent fee based on the impropriety of his fee-sharing agreement with co-counsel, the 2nd Circuit has ruled in affirming judgment.

Law firm’s contingent fee upheld (access required)

By: Sylvia Hsieh
Published: November 18, 2009

Tags: , ,

A law firm’s modified fee agreement, calling for a flat fee plus costs if the case settled early but reversion back to a contingency fee agreement if the case required “further substantial litigation,” is valid, the Alaska Supreme Court has ruled in affirming summary judgment for the firm.

Sign-up for alerts

NEW FREE WHITE PAPER: E-Discovery

This FREE e-report brought to you by Lawyers USA contains the latest tips for conducting thorough and successful electronic discovery for your trial in 2012. We’ve analyzed the latest court rulings and trends in e-discovery to help you and your clients avoid sanctions and win your case.

Click here to get your free White Paper today!