<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawyers USA Online &#187; consumer protection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/tag/consumer-protection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com</link>
	<description>Your Business Partner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:49:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Court nixes $1.5M fee award in coupon-based class settlement&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/17/court-nixes-1-5m-fee-award-in-coupon-based-class-settlement/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/17/court-nixes-1-5m-fee-award-in-coupon-based-class-settlement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action fairness act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A $1.5 million award of attorney fees in a coupon-based settlement of a consumer class action violated the Class Action Fairness Act, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in reversing judgment.</p> <p>The plaintiffs filed three putative class actions in California federal court, alleging that Hewlett-Packard engaged in <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/17/court-nixes-1-5m-fee-award-in-coupon-based-class-settlement/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/17/court-nixes-1-5m-fee-award-in-coupon-based-class-settlement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawmakers renew bid to ban mandatory arbitration&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/10/lawmakers-renew-bid-to-ban-mandatory-arbitration/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/10/lawmakers-renew-bid-to-ban-mandatory-arbitration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 17:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitration Fairness Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files/2013/05/al-Franken.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-92728" title="al-Franken" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files/2013/05/al-Franken.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="133" /></a>Senator Al Franken, D-Minn., has reintroduced a bill that would prohibit the enforcement of mandatory arbitration clauses against employees and consumers.</p> <p>The <a title="Arbitration Fairness Act of 2013" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/wp-files/pdfs-5/s-878.pdf"><strong>Arbitration Fairness Act of 2013</strong></a>, introduced this month as S. 878, provides <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/10/lawmakers-renew-bid-to-ban-mandatory-arbitration/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/10/lawmakers-renew-bid-to-ban-mandatory-arbitration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Land Sales Act disclosures required for condo deal&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/09/land-sales-act-disclosures-required-for-condo-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/09/land-sales-act-disclosures-required-for-condo-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 18:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condominiums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A single-floor condominium unit in a multistory building was a “lot” subject to the disclosure and reporting requirements of the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in affirming judgment.</p> <p>The Act generally protects individual buyers who purchase “lots” in large, uncompleted <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/09/land-sales-act-disclosures-required-for-condo-deal/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/09/land-sales-act-disclosures-required-for-condo-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$45M settlement overturned in FCRA class action&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/25/45m-settlement-overturned-in-fcra-class-action/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/25/45m-settlement-overturned-in-fcra-class-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Credit Reporting Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCRA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Class representatives and class counsel failed to adequately represent absent class members in reaching a $45 million settlement of claims against the three major credit reporting agencies, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in reversing judgment.</p> <p>The plaintiffs are consumers who have been through bankruptcy. In their <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/25/45m-settlement-overturned-in-fcra-class-action/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/25/45m-settlement-overturned-in-fcra-class-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KeyBank could enforce arbitration clause&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/16/keybank-could-enforce-arbitration-clause/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/16/keybank-could-enforce-arbitration-clause/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student loans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>KeyBank could enforce an arbitration clause in its student loan agreements when sued for violating California consumer protection law, the en banc 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled.</p> <p>The decision upholds a similar ruling in the case by a three-judge panel. (See “<a title="Student loan arbitration clause enforceable" <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/16/keybank-could-enforce-arbitration-clause/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/16/keybank-could-enforce-arbitration-clause/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economic loss rule doesn’t bar consumer fraud claim&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/05/economic-loss-rule-doesnt-bar-consumer-fraud-claim/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/05/economic-loss-rule-doesnt-bar-consumer-fraud-claim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 17:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic loss doctrine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The economic loss rule does not bar a consumer fraud claim against an automobile dealership that allegedly failed to make ordered repairs to a vehicle, the Arizona Court of Appeals has ruled in reversing a dismissal.</p> <p>The plaintiff brought his vehicle to the defendant’s dealership for the repair of hail <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/05/economic-loss-rule-doesnt-bar-consumer-fraud-claim/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/05/economic-loss-rule-doesnt-bar-consumer-fraud-claim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Home inspector could limit liability&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/03/home-inspector-could-limit-liability/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/03/home-inspector-could-limit-liability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 17:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limitation of liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A home inspector could enforce a limitation of liability clause in his service agreement, the South Carolina Supreme Court has ruled in affirming a summary judgment.</p> <p>In the course of purchasing a home, the plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant for a home inspection. The contract contained a <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/03/home-inspector-could-limit-liability/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/03/home-inspector-could-limit-liability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer could sue for emotional distress under FCRA&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/02/consumer-could-sue-for-emotional-distress-under-fcra/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/02/consumer-could-sue-for-emotional-distress-under-fcra/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 17:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emotional distress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Credit Reporting Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A consumer produced sufficient evidence of emotional injury to proceed with a claim under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in reversing a summary judgment.</p> <p>The defendant serviced the plaintiff’s home loan. When the plaintiff refinanced his mortgage, the defendant failed to <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/02/consumer-could-sue-for-emotional-distress-under-fcra/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/02/consumer-could-sue-for-emotional-distress-under-fcra/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCRA plaintiff failed to show ‘actual’ damages&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/02/fcra-plaintiff-failed-to-show-actual-damages/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/02/fcra-plaintiff-failed-to-show-actual-damages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 17:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Credit Reporting Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A plaintiff could not pursue a claim under the Fair Credit Reporting Act in the absence of evidence that she suffered actual damages from an allegedly inaccurate criminal background check, the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in affirming a summary judgment.</p> <p>The plaintiff applied for federal housing <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/02/fcra-plaintiff-failed-to-show-actual-damages/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/02/fcra-plaintiff-failed-to-show-actual-damages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC issues new guidelines for online advertising&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/01/ftc-issues-new-guidelines-for-online-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/01/ftc-issues-new-guidelines-for-online-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 18:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia Hsieh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Trade Commission has updated its guidelines for online advertising disclosures to grapple with some of the new technologies since its last guidance in 2000.</p> <p>The guidelines are called “<a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/2013/03/130312dotcomdisclosures.pdf">.com Disclosures: How to Make Effective Disclosures in Digital Advertising.</a>”</p> <p>The FTC’s consumer protection blog summarized the <a href="http://business.ftc.gov/blog/2013/03/ftc-reboots-com-disclosures-four-key-points-and-one-possible-way-bypass-issue-altogethe">key <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/01/ftc-issues-new-guidelines-for-online-advertising/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/01/ftc-issues-new-guidelines-for-online-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
