<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawyers USA Online &#187; Chapter 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/tag/chapter-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com</link>
	<description>Your Business Partner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:05:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Annuity bought with inherited funds may be exempt in bankruptcy&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/26/annuity-bought-with-inherited-funds-may-be-exempt-in-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/26/annuity-bought-with-inherited-funds-may-be-exempt-in-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annuity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=91583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A single-premium fixed annuity purchased with inherited funds may qualify for a bankruptcy exemption under state law, the Georgia Supreme Court has ruled.</p> <p>The decision answered certified questions submitted by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.</p> <p>The debtor inherited $220,000 from a relative. When the debtor was 65, she <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/26/annuity-bought-with-inherited-funds-may-be-exempt-in-bankruptcy/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/26/annuity-bought-with-inherited-funds-may-be-exempt-in-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bankruptcy filings continue to decline&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/07/bankruptcy-filings-continue-to-decline-4/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/07/bankruptcy-filings-continue-to-decline-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 04:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy filings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHAPTER 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=91200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON – In a continuation of the downward trend that began in 2011, bankruptcy filings in federal courts declined during calendar year 2012, according to data released by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.</p> <p>According to the data, 1,221,091 bankruptcies were filed in 2012, a 13 percent drop from <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/07/bankruptcy-filings-continue-to-decline-4/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/02/07/bankruptcy-filings-continue-to-decline-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divorce obligation can’t be discharged in bankruptcy&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/02/divorce-obligation-cant-be-discharged-in-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/02/divorce-obligation-cant-be-discharged-in-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAPCPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=90319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A divorced man’s obligation to pay off a marital debt in the form of a line of credit was not discharged in his bankruptcy case, the Missouri Court of Appeals has ruled in reversing judgment.</p> <p>At the time of the divorce, the parties owed $18,400 on a U.S. Bank line <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/02/divorce-obligation-cant-be-discharged-in-bankruptcy/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/01/02/divorce-obligation-cant-be-discharged-in-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rule would speed retirement payments from bankrupt firms&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/20/rule-would-speed-retirement-payments-from-bankrupt-firms/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/20/rule-would-speed-retirement-payments-from-bankrupt-firms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401(k)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits Security Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=90047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON – A new rule proposed by the U.S. Department of Labor would make it easier for trustees of companies in Chapter 7 bankruptcy to distribute assets from its retirement plans.</p> <p>The rule from the agency’s Employee Benefits Security Administration would allow bankrupt companies’ trustees to use the agency’s Abandoned <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/20/rule-would-speed-retirement-payments-from-bankrupt-firms/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/20/rule-would-speed-retirement-payments-from-bankrupt-firms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chapter 7 case dismissed for ‘abuse’&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/17/chapter-7-case-dismissed-for-abuse/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/17/chapter-7-case-dismissed-for-abuse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[means test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=89954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Chapter 7 debtors could have their case dismissed based on a finding that they “abused” the process by attempting to retain certain luxury items they could have sold to help satisfy their debts, the 11th Circuit has ruled in affirming judgment.</p> <p>The debtors are married. After they filed for Chapter <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/17/chapter-7-case-dismissed-for-abuse/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/17/chapter-7-case-dismissed-for-abuse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divorce obligation wasn’t discharged in bankruptcy&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/11/divorce-obligation-wasnt-discharged-in-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/11/divorce-obligation-wasnt-discharged-in-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=89847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A divorced woman’s obligation to pay 50 percent of her ex-husband’s federal income taxes was not discharged in her Chapter 7 case, the New Hampshire Supreme Court has ruled in reversing judgment.</p> <p>The parties divorced in 2007. The divorce decree required the wife to pay 50 percent of the husband’s <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/11/divorce-obligation-wasnt-discharged-in-bankruptcy/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/11/divorce-obligation-wasnt-discharged-in-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bankruptcy judge lacked power to remedy fraud&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/06/bankruptcy-judge-lacked-power-to-remedy-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/06/bankruptcy-judge-lacked-power-to-remedy-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraudulent conveyance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=89753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A bankruptcy judge lacked the constitutional authority to enter a final judgment in a fraudulent conveyance action against a nonclaimant to a bankruptcy estate, the 9th Circuit has ruled.</p> <p>Before filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection, an insurance agency deposited $373,000 in commission income into an account controlled by a <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/06/bankruptcy-judge-lacked-power-to-remedy-fraud/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/12/06/bankruptcy-judge-lacked-power-to-remedy-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bankruptcy trustee must return funds upon conversion&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/11/08/bankruptcy-trustee-must-return-funds-upon-conversion/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/11/08/bankruptcy-trustee-must-return-funds-upon-conversion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Month's Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHAPTER 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=89064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A bankruptcy trustee was required to return funds acquired post-petition upon the conversion of the debtor’s plan from Chapter 13 to Chapter 7, the 3rd Circuit has ruled in affirming judgment.</p> <p>The debtor filed for Chapter 13 protection and obtained confirmation of a reorganization plan that called for monthly payments <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/11/08/bankruptcy-trustee-must-return-funds-upon-conversion/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/11/08/bankruptcy-trustee-must-return-funds-upon-conversion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wife’s transfer in divorce avoidable in bankruptcy&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/02/wifes-transfer-in-divorce-avoidable-in-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/02/wifes-transfer-in-divorce-avoidable-in-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 16:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraudulent transfer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=88140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A wife’s transfer of her share of the marital residence in her divorce case was properly set aside as a fraudulent transfer when she subsequently filed for bankruptcy, the 6th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel has ruled in affirming judgment.</p> <p>The debtor quitclaimed her interest in the marital residence to her <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/02/wifes-transfer-in-divorce-avoidable-in-bankruptcy/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/10/02/wifes-transfer-in-divorce-avoidable-in-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State can authorize bankruptcy-specific exemptions&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/08/22/state-can-authorize-bankruptcy-specific-exemptions/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/08/22/state-can-authorize-bankruptcy-specific-exemptions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Month's Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homestead exemption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=87041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Chapter 7 debtors could claim homestead exemptions under a state law that is bankruptcy-specific, the 6th Circuit has ruled.</p> <p>The decision reverses a ruling by a bankruptcy appellate panel. (See “<a title="State bankruptcy exemption law unconstitutional" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/02/18/state-bankruptcy-exemption-law-unconstitutional/"><strong>State bankruptcy exemption law unconstitutional</strong></a>,” Lawyers USA, Feb. 18, 2011.)</p> <p>The appeal addressed exemptions <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/08/22/state-can-authorize-bankruptcy-specific-exemptions/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/08/22/state-can-authorize-bankruptcy-specific-exemptions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
