Quantcast

ERISA (access required)

By: Correy Stephenson
Published: June 28, 2010

Tags: , ,

Does a U.S. District Court have the authority to require employees’ prior benefit provisions to be reinstated after finding that the employer violated the advance notice of reduction requirement of ERISA? Does the court have the authority to require at least “comparable” future benefits to be provided based on a finding that participants were promised “comparable” or “larger” future retirement benefits?

Justices to hear ERISA case (access required)

By: Correy Stephenson
Published: June 28, 2010

Tags: , ,

Does a U.S. District Court have the authority to require employees’ prior benefit provisions to be reinstated after finding that the employer violated the advance notice of reduction requirement of ERISA? And does the court have the authority to require at least “comparable” future benefits to be provided based on a finding that participants were promised “comparable” or “larger” future retirement benefits?

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to answer these questions.

Cash balance plan doesn’t violate ERISA (access required)

By: Pat Murphy
Published: October 21, 2009

Tags: ,

A cash balance pension plan did not violate ERISA’s minimum benefit accrual rules by employing a “fractional” test method of computing accrued benefits, the 2nd Circuit has ruled in reversing judgment.

Sign-up for alerts

SUBSCRIBERS: Did you receive the new Lawyers USA Weekly Update in your inbox on Monday?

If not, click here to register and learn more now.