<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawyers USA Online &#187; Bankruptcy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/category/practice-areas/bankruptcy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com</link>
	<description>Your Business Partner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:34:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lien-stripping allowed in ‘Chapter 20’ bankruptcy&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/17/lien-stripping-allowed-in-chapter-20-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/17/lien-stripping-allowed-in-chapter-20-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Chapter 20"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHAPTER 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lien-stripping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act did not create a per se rule barring lien-stripping in so-called &#8220;Chapter 20&#8243; cases, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in affirming judgment.</p> <p>&#8220;Chapter 20&#8243; is a colloquial reference to a Chapter 13 bankruptcy filed within four years of <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/17/lien-stripping-allowed-in-chapter-20-bankruptcy/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/17/lien-stripping-allowed-in-chapter-20-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BANKRUPTCY&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/13/bankruptcy-51/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/13/bankruptcy-51/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 22:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy discharge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of fiduciary duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defalcation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trusts and estates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Proof of malicious intent is not required to prevent the bankruptcy discharge of a debt that arose from a trustee’s self-dealing.</p> <p>See “<a title="Court clarifies bankruptcy discharge standard for fiduciaries" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/13/court-clarifies-bankruptcy-discharge-standard-for-fiduciaries/"><strong>Court clarifies bankruptcy discharge standard for fiduciaries</strong></a>”</p> <p><em>U.S. Supreme Court.<strong> <a title="Bullock v. Champaign" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/wp-files/pdfs-5/bullock-v-bankchampaign.pdf">Bullock v. BankChampaign</a></strong>, No. 11-1518. May <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/13/bankruptcy-51/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></em></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/13/bankruptcy-51/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court clarifies bankruptcy discharge standard&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/13/court-clarifies-bankruptcy-discharge-standard-for-fiduciaries/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/13/court-clarifies-bankruptcy-discharge-standard-for-fiduciaries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 21:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy discharge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of fiduciary duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defalcation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trusts and estates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files/2013/05/supremeCourt-cropRotate.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-92748" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="supremeCourt-cropRotate" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files/2013/05/supremeCourt-cropRotate.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="133" /></a>The U.S. Supreme Court has clarified that proof of malicious intent is not required to prevent the bankruptcy discharge of a debt that arose from a trustee’s self-dealing.</p> <p>“Where actual knowledge of wrongdoing is lacking, we <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/13/court-clarifies-bankruptcy-discharge-standard-for-fiduciaries/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/13/court-clarifies-bankruptcy-discharge-standard-for-fiduciaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Repossessing car lender violated bankruptcy stay&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/10/repossessing-car-lender-violated-bankruptcy-stay/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/10/repossessing-car-lender-violated-bankruptcy-stay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 17:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automatic stay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repossession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A car lender willfully violated the automatic stay in a Chapter 13 case by failing to return a repossessed vehicle to the debtor promptly after receiving notice of his bankruptcy petition, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in affirming judgment.</p> <p>The defendant held a loan secured in <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/10/repossessing-car-lender-violated-bankruptcy-stay/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/10/repossessing-car-lender-violated-bankruptcy-stay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Banking lawyers uneasy about national loan data collection&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/07/lawyers-uneasy-about-national-loan-data-collection/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/07/lawyers-uneasy-about-national-loan-data-collection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 18:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia Hsieh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFPB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Financial Protection Bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Housing Finance Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Cordray]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Recent Senate hearings have sparked renewed debate over a national mortgage database that will hold information about millions of mortgage, credit card and auto loans, loan terms, borrowers’ credit profiles and financial information.</p> <p>The project — the largest database of its kind — was announced in November as a joint <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/07/lawyers-uneasy-about-national-loan-data-collection/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/07/lawyers-uneasy-about-national-loan-data-collection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inherited IRA isn’t exempt in bankruptcy&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/29/inherited-ira-isnt-exempt-in-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/29/inherited-ira-isnt-exempt-in-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Individual Retirement Account]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inheritance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wills and trusts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An IRA that a debtor inherited from her mother was not exempt from creditors’ claims in her bankruptcy case, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in reversing judgment.</p> <p>The Bankruptcy Code generally exempts from creditors’ claims any “retirement funds to the extent that those funds are in <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/29/inherited-ira-isnt-exempt-in-bankruptcy/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/29/inherited-ira-isnt-exempt-in-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anna Nicole bankruptcy case still splitting the circuits&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/18/anna-nicole-bankruptcy-case-still-splitting-the-circuits/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/18/anna-nicole-bankruptcy-case-still-splitting-the-circuits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anna Nicole Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circuit Breaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON – The fallout from the complicated legal battle between the late pinup model Anna Nicole Smith and the estate of the elderly oil magnate she married is still being felt by bankruptcy lawyers across the nation because a new circuit split has emerged, making an already complex legal issue <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/18/anna-nicole-bankruptcy-case-still-splitting-the-circuits/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/18/anna-nicole-bankruptcy-case-still-splitting-the-circuits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bankruptcy trustee’s avoidance actions untimely&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/16/bankruptcy-trustees-avoidance-actions-untimely/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/16/bankruptcy-trustees-avoidance-actions-untimely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avoidance actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy trustee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The appointment of an interim trustee in a Chapter 7 case did not extend the time period for the bringing of avoidance actions to undo transactions that reduced the value of the bankruptcy estate, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in reversing judgment.</p> <p>Under §546(a)(1)(A) of the <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/16/bankruptcy-trustees-avoidance-actions-untimely/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/16/bankruptcy-trustees-avoidance-actions-untimely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Long-term unemployment justified discharge of student loans&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/15/long-term-unemployment-justified-discharge-of-student-loans/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/15/long-term-unemployment-justified-discharge-of-student-loans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 17:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy discharge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student loans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A debtor who was unable to find a job after a decade-long search met the Bankruptcy Code’s standard for discharge of her student loan debt, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in reversing judgment.</p> <p>The debtor is 53 years old and has not held a job since <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/15/long-term-unemployment-justified-discharge-of-student-loans/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/15/long-term-unemployment-justified-discharge-of-student-loans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chapter 13 plan satisfied ‘good faith’ standard&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/01/chapter-13-plan-satisfied-good-faith-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/01/chapter-13-plan-satisfied-good-faith-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 18:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHAPTER 13]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act prohibited the consideration of debtors’ Social Security income in determining whether their Chapter 13 plan was proposed in good faith, the 9th U.S. Circuit of Appeals has ruled in affirming judgment.</p> <p>The case involved a husband and wife who are “above median” <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/01/chapter-13-plan-satisfied-good-faith-standard/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/04/01/chapter-13-plan-satisfied-good-faith-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
