<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawyers USA Online &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com</link>
	<description>Your Business Partner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:39:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Check-cashing firm’s arbitration clause enforceable&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/check-cashing-firms-arbitration-clause-enforceable/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/check-cashing-firms-arbitration-clause-enforceable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payday loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predatory lending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A check-cashing business could enforce an updated version of an arbitration clause included in its delayed-deposit customer agreements, the Mississippi Court of Appeals has ruled.</p> <p>The defendant is in the business of delayed-deposit check cashing. Essentially, the business involves cashing the personal checks of customers for up to $500 plus <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/check-cashing-firms-arbitration-clause-enforceable/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/check-cashing-firms-arbitration-clause-enforceable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medicare statute doesn’t preempt state comp law&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/medicare-statute-doesnt-preempt-state-comp-law/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/medicare-statute-doesnt-preempt-state-comp-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare Secondary Payer statute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Medicare Secondary Payer Statute does not preempt a state law requiring a workers’ compensation claimant to obtain preauthorization before incurring certain medical expenses, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in affirming judgment.</p> <p>The plaintiff injured his back at work and began receiving workers’ compensation benefits from <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/medicare-statute-doesnt-preempt-state-comp-law/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/medicare-statute-doesnt-preempt-state-comp-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC briefs Senate committee on credit reporting accuracy&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/ftc-briefs-senate-committee-on-credit-reporting-accuracy/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/ftc-briefs-senate-committee-on-credit-reporting-accuracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Credit Reporting Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Errors in credit reports can cause businesses to deny credit to potentially valuable customers, a director of the Federal Trade Commission warned a U.S. Senate subcommittee earlier this month.</p> <p>“The Commission recognizes the importance of accurate and complete credit reports, both to businesses that use them to make decisions and <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/ftc-briefs-senate-committee-on-credit-reporting-accuracy/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/ftc-briefs-senate-committee-on-credit-reporting-accuracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court takes up peeved airline flyer’s preemption case&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/court-takes-up-peeved-airline-flyers-preemption-case/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/court-takes-up-peeved-airline-flyers-preemption-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airline Deregulation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON – A long running battle between a Minnesota frequent flyer and an airline carrier has landed before the U.S. Supreme Court, giving the justices yet another chance to weigh in on whether a federal law preempts a state law-based lawsuit.</p> <p>The justices agreed on May 20 to hear the <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/court-takes-up-peeved-airline-flyers-preemption-case/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/court-takes-up-peeved-airline-flyers-preemption-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do Not Pass Go: Attorney reigns as U.S. Monopoly champ&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/do-not-pass-go-attorney-reigns-as-u-s-monopoly-champ/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/do-not-pass-go-attorney-reigns-as-u-s-monopoly-champ/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Correy Stephenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Buffalo, N.Y., attorney Richard J. Marinaccio does not hesitate to stand up for a cause he truly believes in.</p> <p>The 30-year-old corporate attorney at Phillips Lytle handles transactional matters such as mergers and acquisitions as well as general contract work. (To read more about Marinaccio&#8217;s career, see <a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/about-monopoly-champion-richard-j-marinaccio/">About Monopoly <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/do-not-pass-go-attorney-reigns-as-u-s-monopoly-champ/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/do-not-pass-go-attorney-reigns-as-u-s-monopoly-champ/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to play competitive Monopoly&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/how-to-play-competitive-monopoly/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/how-to-play-competitive-monopoly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Correy Stephenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Beginning in the 1970s, a U.S. Monopoly champion has been crowned every four to six years.</p> <p>But not just any Monopoly lover can make it to the finals.</p> <p>(To read about attorney Richard J. Marinaccio&#8217;s experience as a Monopoly champion, see <a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/do-not-pass-go-attorney-reigns-as-u-s-monopoly-champ/">Do Not Pass Go: Attorney reigns as U.S. <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/how-to-play-competitive-monopoly/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/how-to-play-competitive-monopoly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>About Monopoly champion Richard J. Marinaccio&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/about-monopoly-champion-richard-j-marinaccio/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/about-monopoly-champion-richard-j-marinaccio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Correy Stephenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>From an early age, Richard J. Marinaccio wanted to be a professional and “carry a briefcase and work in an office.”</p> <p>The legal profession seemed like a good fit, he said, and he had law school in his sights while still in college.</p> <p>(To read about Marinaccio&#8217;s experience as a <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/about-monopoly-champion-richard-j-marinaccio/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/about-monopoly-champion-richard-j-marinaccio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benchmarks: Ex-NCAA quarterback can pursue publicity claim against EA Sports&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/benchmarks-ex-ncaa-quarterback-can-pursue-likeness-claim-against-ea-sports/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/benchmarks-ex-ncaa-quarterback-can-pursue-likeness-claim-against-ea-sports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right of publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The First Amendment does not bar the lawsuit of a former Rutgers quarterback who claims that EA Sports used his likeness without permission in the immensely popular “NCAA Football” series of video games.</p> <p>That’s the conclusion reached Tuesday by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.</p> <p>In reviving the lawsuit <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/benchmarks-ex-ncaa-quarterback-can-pursue-likeness-claim-against-ea-sports/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/benchmarks-ex-ncaa-quarterback-can-pursue-likeness-claim-against-ea-sports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employee could pursue ADA claim despite Chapter 13 bankruptcy&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/21/employee-could-pursue-ada-claim-despite-chapter-13-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/21/employee-could-pursue-ada-claim-despite-chapter-13-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHAPTER 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disability discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An employee did not lose standing to pursue a federal disability discrimination claim by filing for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in affirming judgment.</p> <p>The plaintiff is legally blind in his right eye. When he experienced medical problems that threatened the vision in <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/21/employee-could-pursue-ada-claim-despite-chapter-13-bankruptcy/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/21/employee-could-pursue-ada-claim-despite-chapter-13-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wage &amp; hour suits hit record high, firm study finds&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/21/wage-hour-suits-hit-record-high-firm-study-finds/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/21/wage-hour-suits-hit-record-high-firm-study-finds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair labor standards act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seyfarth Shaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wage and hour claims]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=92883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Wage-and-hour lawsuits filed under the Fair Labor Standards Act have hit an all-time high, according to a new study of federal court caseloads.</p> <p>Government figures showed that 7,764 FLSA cases were filed in federal court during the twelve-month period ending March 30, 2013. That’s the most since defense firm Seyfarth <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/21/wage-hour-suits-hit-record-high-firm-study-finds/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/21/wage-hour-suits-hit-record-high-firm-study-finds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
