<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawyers USA Online &#187; Personal Injury and Tort</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/category/news/Personal-Injury-and-Tort/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com</link>
	<description>Your Business Partner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:09:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>FDA, medical device makers reach deal on user fees&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/08/fda-medical-device-makers-reach-deal-on-user-fees/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/08/fda-medical-device-makers-reach-deal-on-user-fees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Device User Fee Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical devices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/08/fda-medical-device-makers-reach-deal-on-user-fees/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON – The Food and Drug Administration and the medical device manufacturing industry have reached a tentative agreement on user fees under the reauthorization of the Medical Device User Fee Act.</p> <p>Though all the details of the proposed recommendations for the reauthorization have not been finalized, the parties have agreed <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/08/fda-medical-device-makers-reach-deal-on-user-fees/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/08/fda-medical-device-makers-reach-deal-on-user-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bus company pays $5 million to settle wrongful death&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/08/bus-company-pays-5-million-to-settle-wrongful-death/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/08/bus-company-pays-5-million-to-settle-wrongful-death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Ogden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car accident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrongful death]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/08/bus-company-pays-5-million-to-settle-wrongful-death/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A Cincinnati-based school bus company has agreed to pay $5 million to settle a wrongful death lawsuit in Missouri where one of the drivers for First Student drove a bus over and killed a teen.</p> <p>Read the full article from <em>Cincinnati.com</em>: <strong><a href="http://news.cincinnati.com/article/20120207/NEWS/302070114/Cincinnati-bus-company-pays-5M-settles-death-suit">Cincinnati bus company pays $5M, settles death suit</a></strong></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/08/bus-company-pays-5-million-to-settle-wrongful-death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York City settles loitering suit for $15 million&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/08/new-york-city-settles-loitering-suit-for-15-million/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/08/new-york-city-settles-loitering-suit-for-15-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Ogden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contempt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loitering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/08/new-york-city-settles-loitering-suit-for-15-million/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>New York City has agreed to pay $15 million to settle a class-action lawsuit brought on behalf of thousands of people who were charged with loitering decades after the state&#8217;s laws were ruled unconstitutional.</p> <p>Read the full article from <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>: <strong><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204136404577209393628604550.html">City Settles Loitering Suit for $15 <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/08/new-york-city-settles-loitering-suit-for-15-million/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></a></strong></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/08/new-york-city-settles-loitering-suit-for-15-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Groups ask court to block FDA’s tobacco warning rule&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/07/groups-ask-court-to-block-fda%e2%80%99s-tobacco-warning-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/07/groups-ask-court-to-block-fda%e2%80%99s-tobacco-warning-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarette warnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/07/groups-ask-court-to-block-fda%e2%80%99s-tobacco-warning-rule/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-79998" title="tobacco-warning" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files/2011/08/tobacco-warning.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="133" />WASHINGTON – Business groups are urging a federal court to uphold an order blocking the Food and Drug Administration from implementing a rule requiring tobacco product makers to place large, graphic warnings on product packaging.</p> <p>In June, the FDA <a href="../../../../../blog/2011/06/24/fda-unveils-new-graphic-cigarette-warnings/"><strong>unveiled <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/07/groups-ask-court-to-block-fda%e2%80%99s-tobacco-warning-rule/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></strong></a></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/07/groups-ask-court-to-block-fda%e2%80%99s-tobacco-warning-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navy vets can’t proceed with asbestos suits&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/07/navy-vets-can%e2%80%99t-proceed-with-asbestos-suits/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/07/navy-vets-can%e2%80%99t-proceed-with-asbestos-suits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strict liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/07/navy-vets-can%e2%80%99t-proceed-with-asbestos-suits/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Manufacturers of machinery used in U.S. Navy ships are not liable for injuries caused by asbestos products manufactured by others but used in conjunction with their asbestos-free products, a U.S. District Court in Pennsylvania has ruled in granting summary judgment.</p> <p>The three plaintiffs in the case served in the Navy <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/07/navy-vets-can%e2%80%99t-proceed-with-asbestos-suits/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/07/navy-vets-can%e2%80%99t-proceed-with-asbestos-suits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS eases rule making injury awards non-taxable&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/07/irs-eases-rule-making-injury-awards-non-taxable/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/07/irs-eases-rule-making-injury-awards-non-taxable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gross income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Job Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax on damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/07/irs-eases-rule-making-injury-awards-non-taxable/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-12348" title="taxes3" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files//srv/www/lwusa/releases/20091210164057/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files//2010/01/taxes3.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="133" />Awards for physical injuries are no longer required to be derived from a vindication of “tort” rights in order to qualify for exclusion from a taxpayer’s gross income, according to a recent rule amendment issued by the Internal Revenue Service.</p> <p>The <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/07/irs-eases-rule-making-injury-awards-non-taxable/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/07/irs-eases-rule-making-injury-awards-non-taxable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jury awards $975,000 to woman who gave birth on jail cell floor&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/07/jury-awards-975000-to-woman-who-gave-birth-on-jail-cell-floor/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/07/jury-awards-975000-to-woman-who-gave-birth-on-jail-cell-floor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Ogden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/07/jury-awards-975000-to-woman-who-gave-birth-on-jail-cell-floor/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A federal jury has awarded nearly $1 million to a severely mentally ill homeless woman who gave birth alone on the floor of a King County, Wash. jail cell 14 years ago.</p> <p>Read the full article from <em>The Seattle Times</em>: <strong><a href="http://www.wenatcheeworld.com/news/2012/feb/07/jury-awards-975000-to-woman-who-gave-birth-on/">Jury awards $975,000 to woman who gave birth on <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/07/jury-awards-975000-to-woman-who-gave-birth-on-jail-cell-floor/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></a></strong></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/07/jury-awards-975000-to-woman-who-gave-birth-on-jail-cell-floor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family wins $2 million wrongful death civil suit against highway patrol&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/06/family-wins-2-million-wrongful-death-civil-suit-against-highway-patrol/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/06/family-wins-2-million-wrongful-death-civil-suit-against-highway-patrol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Ogden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrongful death]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/06/family-wins-2-million-wrongful-death-civil-suit-against-highway-patrol/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The family of Joey Pinasco &#8211; a 21-year-old shot to death by two California Highway Patrol officers &#8211; has won a $2 million civil lawsuit against the department in federal court Sacramento.</p> <p>Read the full article from <em>The Record</em>: <strong><a href="http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120201/A_NEWS/202010320">Jury: CHP was at fault</a></strong></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/06/family-wins-2-million-wrongful-death-civil-suit-against-highway-patrol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plaintiffs’ lawyers challenge medical ghostwriters&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/03/plaintiffs%e2%80%99-lawyers-challenge-medical-ghostwriters/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/03/plaintiffs%e2%80%99-lawyers-challenge-medical-ghostwriters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia Hsieh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ghostwriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[products liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/03/plaintiffs%e2%80%99-lawyers-challenge-medical-ghostwriters/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-68928" title="ghostwriter" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files//srv/www/lwusa/releases/20100504194238/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files//2010/05/ghostwriter.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="133" />Plaintiffs’ attorneys are beginning to challenge the practice of medical ghostwriting, in which doctors lend their names to medical marketing literature, according to an article published in the medical journal Public Library of Science.</p> <p>The practice has been uncovered during discovery <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/03/plaintiffs%e2%80%99-lawyers-challenge-medical-ghostwriters/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/03/plaintiffs%e2%80%99-lawyers-challenge-medical-ghostwriters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stryker hip suit isn’t completely preempted&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/03/stryker-hip-suit-isn%e2%80%99t-completely-preempted/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/03/stryker-hip-suit-isn%e2%80%99t-completely-preempted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hip replacement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Device Amendments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/03/stryker-hip-suit-isn%e2%80%99t-completely-preempted/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Federal law regulating medical devices doesn’t completely preempt the claims of a plaintiff who alleged that a hip replacement product malfunctioned and caused him injury, the 5th Circuit has ruled.</p> <p>The plaintiff underwent surgery involving the implantation of a Trident hip replacement system in his left hip. The Trident system <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/03/stryker-hip-suit-isn%e2%80%99t-completely-preempted/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/03/stryker-hip-suit-isn%e2%80%99t-completely-preempted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
