<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawyers USA Online &#187; Employment Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/category/news/Employment-Law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com</link>
	<description>Your Business Partner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:49:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Calif. justices to decide if undocumented alien can practice law&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/23/calif-justices-to-decide-if-undocumented-alien-can-practice-law/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/23/calif-justices-to-decide-if-undocumented-alien-can-practice-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[practice of law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[undocumented immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[undocumented workers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=84532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The California Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether a law graduate’s status as an undocumented alien disqualifies him from being admitted to the state bar.</p> <p>According to a <a title="press release" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/wp-files/pdfs-4/garcia-press-release.pdf"><strong>press release</strong></a> from the court, Sergio C. Garcia has graduated from law school and passed the California bar <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/23/calif-justices-to-decide-if-undocumented-alien-can-practice-law/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/23/calif-justices-to-decide-if-undocumented-alien-can-practice-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employee can’t sue for anti-immigrant bias&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/23/employee-cant-sue-for-anti-immigrant-bias/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/23/employee-cant-sue-for-anti-immigrant-bias/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=84526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Federal employment discrimination law does not provide a remedy for a bank employee who claims she was fired because of her marriage to a Mexican citizen who had entered the U.S. illegally, the 7th Circuit has ruled in affirming a summary judgment.</p> <p>The plaintiff worked as a bank manager for <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/23/employee-cant-sue-for-anti-immigrant-bias/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/23/employee-cant-sue-for-anti-immigrant-bias/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Injury caused by cell phone use yields $22 million verdict&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/23/injury-caused-by-cell-phone-use-yields-22-million-verdict/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/23/injury-caused-by-cell-phone-use-yields-22-million-verdict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Sheehan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car accident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=84522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A Texas jury has awarded more than $22 million to a woman injured when her car was broadsided by a station wagon driven by a Coca-Cola marketing employee talking on her cell phone.</p> <p>The Nueces County jury awarded 37-year-old Vanice Chatman-Wilson more than $11.5 million for lost wages, medical expenses <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/23/injury-caused-by-cell-phone-use-yields-22-million-verdict/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/23/injury-caused-by-cell-phone-use-yields-22-million-verdict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Police officer’s lawsuit divides town, settles for $1.2 million&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/22/police-officers-lawsuit-divides-town-settles-for-1-2-million/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/22/police-officers-lawsuit-divides-town-settles-for-1-2-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 18:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan McDonald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights violation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emotional distress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=84498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At first, attorney Michael Sacco thought he was handling a routine disability claim.

A sole practitioner in Westfield, Mass. who typically represents retirement boards, Sacco quickly found himself knee-deep in a civil rights lawsuit that offered a glimpse into the inner political machinations of a sleepy town and its police department, revealing a sordid mess.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/22/police-officers-lawsuit-divides-town-settles-for-1-2-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hostile environment suit needn’t include ‘sex’ claims&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/22/hostile-environment-suit-neednt-include-sex-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/22/hostile-environment-suit-neednt-include-sex-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hostile work environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual harassment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=84488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A female public employee could sue for hostile work environment under state law – even if the alleged offending conduct fell outside the definition of “sexual harassment,” the Minnesota Supreme Court has ruled.</p> <p>The plaintiff worked as a custodian for a public school district. She alleged that her male supervisor <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/22/hostile-environment-suit-neednt-include-sex-claims/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/22/hostile-environment-suit-neednt-include-sex-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Catholic groups sue over birth control mandate&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/21/catholic-groups-sue-over-birth-control-mandate/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/21/catholic-groups-sue-over-birth-control-mandate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Health and Human Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administrations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=84469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON – In a series of lawsuits filed across the country Monday, dozens of Roman Catholic archdiocese, schools and other organizations are seeking to block the recent Health and Human Services mandate that requires most employers to cover contraception in their health care plans.</p> <p>The rule has come under fire <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/21/catholic-groups-sue-over-birth-control-mandate/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/21/catholic-groups-sue-over-birth-control-mandate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ERISA plan could offset other disability payments&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/21/erisa-plan-could-offset-other-disability-payments/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/21/erisa-plan-could-offset-other-disability-payments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 16:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disability benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offset]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=84444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An ERISA plan could reduce an insured’s monthly long-term disability benefits by the amount of disability payments that he received from a separate insurance policy, the 3rd Circuit has ruled in affirming judgment.</p> <p>The plaintiff is a dentist who had long-term disability coverage under two policies. In addition to a <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/21/erisa-plan-could-offset-other-disability-payments/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/21/erisa-plan-could-offset-other-disability-payments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Partner can sue partnership for retaliation&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/18/partner-can-sue-partnership-for-retaliation/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/18/partner-can-sue-partnership-for-retaliation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual harassment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=84416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A partner in a professional medical practice could sue the partnership for retaliating against her based on her opposing the sexual harassment of employees, the California Court of Appeal has ruled in reversing judgment.</p> <p>The plaintiff is a doctor who is a member of a California general partnership with approximately <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/18/partner-can-sue-partnership-for-retaliation/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/18/partner-can-sue-partnership-for-retaliation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Home care provider isn’t entitled to overtime&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/17/home-care-provider-isnt-entitled-to-overtime/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/17/home-care-provider-isnt-entitled-to-overtime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wage and hour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=84367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An employee hired to provide in-home care for an elderly woman was not entitled to overtime, the California Court of Appeal has ruled in reversing a $123,000 judgment.</p> <p>The defendant was a woman in her 90s who hired the plaintiff to care for her in her home. After being terminated, <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/17/home-care-provider-isnt-entitled-to-overtime/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/17/home-care-provider-isnt-entitled-to-overtime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labor contractor agrees to settle harassment suit&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/17/labor-contractor-agrees-to-settle-harassment-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/17/labor-contractor-agrees-to-settle-harassment-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Ogden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual harassment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=84364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A California farm labor contractor has agreed to pay $150,000 to settle a federal agency&#8217;s suit on behalf of female vineyard workers in Sonoma and Mendocino counties who said a crew supervisor harassed them with crude remarks and demanded sex to keep their jobs.</p> <p>Read the full article from <em>The <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/17/labor-contractor-agrees-to-settle-harassment-suit/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></em></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/17/labor-contractor-agrees-to-settle-harassment-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
