<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawyers USA Online &#187; Bankruptcy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/category/news/Bankruptcy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com</link>
	<description>Your Business Partner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:09:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Foreclosing bank can’t set aside bankruptcy stay&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/03/foreclosing-bank-can%e2%80%99t-set-aside-bankruptcy-stay/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/03/foreclosing-bank-can%e2%80%99t-set-aside-bankruptcy-stay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automatic stay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHAPTER 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/03/foreclosing-bank-can%e2%80%99t-set-aside-bankruptcy-stay/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A bank seeking to proceed with a home foreclosure lacked standing to obtain relief from the automatic stay entered in the homeowner’s bankruptcy case, the 10th Circuit has ruled in reversing judgment.</p> <p>The bank brought a foreclosure action against the homeowner and a state court issued an order authorizing the <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/03/foreclosing-bank-can%e2%80%99t-set-aside-bankruptcy-stay/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/02/03/foreclosing-bank-can%e2%80%99t-set-aside-bankruptcy-stay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawyer disbarred for false statements in bankruptcy&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/01/24/lawyer-disbarred-for-false-statements-in-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/01/24/lawyer-disbarred-for-false-statements-in-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer discipline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules of Professional Conduct]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/01/24/lawyer-disbarred-for-false-statements-in-bankruptcy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A lawyer could be disbarred for making false statements in the bankruptcy case of a client who wanted to hide her husband’s income, the New Hampshire Supreme Court has ruled.</p> <p>The lawyer represented a client in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy case. The client was a newlywed who allegedly insisted that <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/01/24/lawyer-disbarred-for-false-statements-in-bankruptcy/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/01/24/lawyer-disbarred-for-false-statements-in-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bankruptcy judges, lawyers frustrated by ‘Stern’ ruling&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/30/bankruptcy-judges-lawyers-frustrated-by-%e2%80%98stern%e2%80%99-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/30/bankruptcy-judges-lawyers-frustrated-by-%e2%80%98stern%e2%80%99-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 09:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Frank and Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stern v. Marshall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/30/bankruptcy-judges-lawyers-frustrated-by-%e2%80%98stern%e2%80%99-ruling/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-77045" title="judge-confused" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files//2011/02/judge-confused.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="133" />U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Barbara J. Houser’s job is a lot harder than it used to be, and she is not afraid to admit it.</p> <p>The problem for Houser and her colleagues, as well as practitioners across the country, is the <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/30/bankruptcy-judges-lawyers-frustrated-by-%e2%80%98stern%e2%80%99-ruling/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/30/bankruptcy-judges-lawyers-frustrated-by-%e2%80%98stern%e2%80%99-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Non-compliant plan may be exempt in bankruptcy&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/28/non-compliant-plan-may-be-exempt-in-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/28/non-compliant-plan-may-be-exempt-in-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keough retirement plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/28/non-compliant-plan-may-be-exempt-in-bankruptcy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A retirement plan that was not technically “tax qualified” under federal law may still be exempt from the taxpayer’s bankruptcy estate, the Utah Supreme Court has ruled in answering a certified question from a U.S. District Court.</p> <p>State law provides that a “retirement plan or arrangement that is described in <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/28/non-compliant-plan-may-be-exempt-in-bankruptcy/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/28/non-compliant-plan-may-be-exempt-in-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Automatic stay for bankrupt party doesn’t apply to co-defendants&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/23/automatic-stay-for-bankrupt-party-doesn%e2%80%99t-apply-to-co-defendants/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/23/automatic-stay-for-bankrupt-party-doesn%e2%80%99t-apply-to-co-defendants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 18:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Correy Stephenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automatic stay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint and several liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrongful death]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/23/automatic-stay-for-bankrupt-party-doesn%e2%80%99t-apply-to-co-defendants/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An insolvent asbestos defendant’s bankruptcy filing does not stay all litigation involving solvent co-defendants, the Alabama Supreme Court has ruled.</p> <p>The plaintiffs filed a wrongful death suit against a number of defendants based on their decedents’ exposure to asbestos particles. They sought to hold the defendants jointly and severally liable.</p> <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/23/automatic-stay-for-bankrupt-party-doesn%e2%80%99t-apply-to-co-defendants/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/23/automatic-stay-for-bankrupt-party-doesn%e2%80%99t-apply-to-co-defendants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bankruptcy case dismissed for flawed credit counseling&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/20/bankruptcy-case-dismissed-for-flawed-credit-counseling/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/20/bankruptcy-case-dismissed-for-flawed-credit-counseling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHAPTER 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit counseling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/20/bankruptcy-case-dismissed-for-flawed-credit-counseling/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A Chapter 13 case could be dismissed because the debtor failed to complete both the Internet and telephone portions of his mandatory prepetition credit counseling, the 6th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel has ruled in affirming judgment.</p> <p>Section 109(h) of the Bankruptcy Code generally requires that a debtor must have completed <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/20/bankruptcy-case-dismissed-for-flawed-credit-counseling/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/20/bankruptcy-case-dismissed-for-flawed-credit-counseling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justices to decide ‘cramdown’ rights of secured lender&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/12/justices-to-decide-%e2%80%98cramdown%e2%80%99-rights-of-secured-lender/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/12/justices-to-decide-%e2%80%98cramdown%e2%80%99-rights-of-secured-lender/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cramdown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/12/justices-to-decide-%e2%80%98cramdown%e2%80%99-rights-of-secured-lender/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether a Chapter 11 debtor may pursue a reorganization plan that proposes to sell encumbered assets at auction free and clear of liens without allowing a secured lender to bid its credit.</p> <p>The Court will review a decision by the 7th Circuit that a <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/12/justices-to-decide-%e2%80%98cramdown%e2%80%99-rights-of-secured-lender/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/12/justices-to-decide-%e2%80%98cramdown%e2%80%99-rights-of-secured-lender/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bankruptcy procedure rules are revised&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/07/bankruptcy-procedure-rules-are-revised/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/07/bankruptcy-procedure-rules-are-revised/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 21:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Lundberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/07/bankruptcy-procedure-rules-are-revised/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several changes to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure went into effect on Dec. 1.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/07/bankruptcy-procedure-rules-are-revised/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assignee can set aside bankruptcy stay&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/07/assignee-can-set-aside-bankruptcy-stay/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/07/assignee-can-set-aside-bankruptcy-stay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Month's Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automatic stay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/07/assignee-can-set-aside-bankruptcy-stay/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The assignee of a security interest in a motor vehicle had standing to set aside the automatic stay in the borrower’s bankruptcy case, even though the assignment hadn’t been recorded in accordance with applicable state law, the 6th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel has ruled in reversing judgment.</p> <p>An affiliate of <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/07/assignee-can-set-aside-bankruptcy-stay/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/07/assignee-can-set-aside-bankruptcy-stay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bankruptcy order on abuse issue can be appealed&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/02/bankruptcy-order-on-abuse-issue-can-be-appealed/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/02/bankruptcy-order-on-abuse-issue-can-be-appealed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 18:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Correy Stephenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHAPTER 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/02/bankruptcy-order-on-abuse-issue-can-be-appealed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An order denying a U.S. Trustee’s motion to dismiss a debtor’s Chapter 7 bankruptcy case as abusive is a final appealable order, the 4th Circuit has ruled in reversing a denial of a motion to appeal.</p> <p>A married couple filed for Chapter 13 protection and subsequently converted their petition to <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/02/bankruptcy-order-on-abuse-issue-can-be-appealed/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2011/12/02/bankruptcy-order-on-abuse-issue-can-be-appealed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
