<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawyers USA Online &#187; Bankruptcy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/category/news/Bankruptcy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com</link>
	<description>Your Business Partner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:49:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Class claims against Owens Corning weren’t discharged&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/22/class-claims-against-owens-corning-werent-discharged/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/22/class-claims-against-owens-corning-werent-discharged/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of warranty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strict liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=84490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A class claims seeking damages for alleged defects in Owens Corning roofing shingles were not discharged by the company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy case, the 3rd Circuit has ruled in reversing a summary judgment.</p> <p>The two named plaintiffs in the case both had roofing shingles manufactured by Owens Corning installed on <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/22/class-claims-against-owens-corning-werent-discharged/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/22/class-claims-against-owens-corning-werent-discharged/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bankruptcy filings continue downward trend&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/18/bankruptcy-filings-continue-downward-trend/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/18/bankruptcy-filings-continue-downward-trend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 14:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy filings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=84405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON – After years of record-breaking numbers of bankruptcy filings, the recent trend of declining filings continues, based on the most recent figures released by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.</p> <p>Bankruptcy filings for the 12-month period ending March 31, 2012, fell 13 percent compared to bankruptcy filings for <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/18/bankruptcy-filings-continue-downward-trend/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/18/bankruptcy-filings-continue-downward-trend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill to temporarily extend bankruptcy judgeships passes&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/16/bill-to-temporarily-extend-bankruptcy-judgeships-passes/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/16/bill-to-temporarily-extend-bankruptcy-judgeships-passes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 01:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy judges]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=84353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5252" title="gavel1" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files//srv/www/lwusa/releases/20090526204234/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files//2009/06/gavel1.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="150" />WASHINGTON – Congress has passed legislation that will temporarily save dozens of bankruptcy judgeships in 14 states and Puerto Rico from expiring.</p> <p>The Temporary Bankruptcy Judgeships Extension Act of 2012, <strong><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:HR04967:@@@R">H.R. 4967</a></strong>, which is expected to be signed into law <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/16/bill-to-temporarily-extend-bankruptcy-judgeships-passes/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/16/bill-to-temporarily-extend-bankruptcy-judgeships-passes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Farm sale income tax not dischargeable in bankruptcy&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/14/farm-sale-income-tax-not-dischargeable-in-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/14/farm-sale-income-tax-not-dischargeable-in-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 17:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discahrge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=84286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-78282" title="barn" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files//2011/05/barn.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="133" />The federal income tax liability resulting from the sale of a farm after a Chapter 12 bankruptcy filing is not “incurred by the estate” under §503(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and thus is neither collectible nor dischargeable in the bankruptcy plan, <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/14/farm-sale-income-tax-not-dischargeable-in-bankruptcy/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/14/farm-sale-income-tax-not-dischargeable-in-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asbestos policies can be assigned in bankruptcy&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/03/asbestos-policies-can-be-assigned-in-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/03/asbestos-policies-can-be-assigned-in-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 16:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Month's Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/?p=84094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Liability insurers could not enforce anti-assignment clauses in their policies when their policyholder sought relief in bankruptcy from asbestos claims, the 3rd Circuit has ruled in affirming judgment.</p> <p>The debtor, Federal-Mogul Global, Inc., is one of the world’s largest manufacturers of automobile parts. In 2001, the debtor filed for Chapter <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/03/asbestos-policies-can-be-assigned-in-bankruptcy/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/05/03/asbestos-policies-can-be-assigned-in-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Post-petition home sale proceeds included in bankruptcy estate&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/27/post-petition-home-sale-proceeds-included-in-bankruptcy-estate/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/27/post-petition-home-sale-proceeds-included-in-bankruptcy-estate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reni Gertner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Month's Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homestead exemption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/27/post-petition-home-sale-proceeds-included-in-bankruptcy-estate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The proceeds from a couple’s post-petition sale of their homestead must be included in their bankruptcy estate, the 9th Circuit has ruled.</p> <p>In an earlier Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing, the debtors’ principal creditor objected to their discharge, alleging that they fraudulently concealed assets, and won a judgment that increased to <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/27/post-petition-home-sale-proceeds-included-in-bankruptcy-estate/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/27/post-petition-home-sale-proceeds-included-in-bankruptcy-estate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Non-compliant plan is exempt in bankruptcy&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/27/non-compliant-plan-is-exempt-in-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/27/non-compliant-plan-is-exempt-in-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reni Gertner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business and Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Month's Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keough retirement plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement plan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/27/non-compliant-plan-is-exempt-in-bankruptcy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A retirement plan that was not technically “tax qualified” under federal law is exempt from the taxpayer’s bankruptcy estate, the 10th Circuit has ruled in applying Utah law.</p> <p>Utah law provides that a “retirement plan or arrangement that is described in §401(a)” of the Internal Revenue Code is exempt from <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/27/non-compliant-plan-is-exempt-in-bankruptcy/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/27/non-compliant-plan-is-exempt-in-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil rights suit barred by nondisclosure in bankruptcy&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/24/civil-rights-suit-barred-by-nondisclosure-in-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/24/civil-rights-suit-barred-by-nondisclosure-in-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Month's Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search and seizure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/24/civil-rights-suit-barred-by-nondisclosure-in-bankruptcy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A homeowner could not sue police for conducting illegal searches of his properties because he failed to disclose the lawsuit in his Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, the 1st Circuit has ruled in affirming a dismissal.</p> <p>After filing for bankruptcy, police searched the plaintiff’s properties for environmental violations. The search warrants <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/24/civil-rights-suit-barred-by-nondisclosure-in-bankruptcy/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/24/civil-rights-suit-barred-by-nondisclosure-in-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justices tackle credit-bidding in bankruptcy ‘cramdown’ plan&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/23/justices-tackle-credit-bidding-in-bankruptcy-%e2%80%98cramdown%e2%80%99-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/23/justices-tackle-credit-bidding-in-bankruptcy-%e2%80%98cramdown%e2%80%99-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Atkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from the Capitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit bid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secured creditor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/23/justices-tackle-credit-bidding-in-bankruptcy-%e2%80%98cramdown%e2%80%99-plan/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-83945" title="auction-paddle" src="http://lawyersusaonline.com/files/2012/04/auction-paddle.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="133" />WASHINGTON – The justices of the U.S. Supreme Court took up a complicated bankruptcy case Monday, parsing the language of the Bankruptcy Code to determine if a Chapter 11 debtor must give a secured creditor the right to credit bid items <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/23/justices-tackle-credit-bidding-in-bankruptcy-%e2%80%98cramdown%e2%80%99-plan/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></img></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/23/justices-tackle-credit-bidding-in-bankruptcy-%e2%80%98cramdown%e2%80%99-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debtor can’t discharge award for loss of consortium&#160;</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/23/debtor-can%e2%80%99t-discharge-award-for-loss-of-consortium/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/23/debtor-can%e2%80%99t-discharge-award-for-loss-of-consortium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury and Tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loss of consortium]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/23/debtor-can%e2%80%99t-discharge-award-for-loss-of-consortium/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A Chapter 7 debtor could not obtain a bankruptcy discharge of a $300,000 award for loss of consortium stemming from the attempted murder of his ex-wife, the 7th Circuit has ruled in affirming judgment.</p> <p>The debtor received life imprisonment after he beat his ex-wife with a baseball bat and stuffed <br /><a href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/23/debtor-can%e2%80%99t-discharge-award-for-loss-of-consortium/">&#187; Continue Reading.</a></br></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2012/04/23/debtor-can%e2%80%99t-discharge-award-for-loss-of-consortium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
