Quantcast

Dram shop plaintiffs didn’t need eyewitness (access required)

Published: March 12, 2013

Tags: , ,

Plaintiffs in a dram shop case were not required to provide eyewitness testimony to prove that the other driver was served an alcoholic beverage while visibly intoxicated, the New Jersey Appellate Division has ruled in reversing a summary judgment.
© Copyright 2013 Lawyers USA. All Rights Reserved.


Comments

You must be logged in to post comments.

Sign-up for alerts

FEATURED PODCAST


Lawyers USA presents Lawyers in Practice

This is the first edition of Lawyers USA's Lawyers in Practice, where we discuss the hot issues facing practicing attorneys and law firms.

In this edition, we discuss how to prevent legal malpractice claims with better communication, with Jim Calloway, director of the Oklahoma Bar Association's Management Assistance Program, and Dan Pinnington, vice-president of Claims Prevention and Stakeholder Relations at LawPRO, a professional liability carrier based in Toronto, Canada.

Visit the Legal Malpractice Monitor to listen to the podcast.

Click here to download the podcast.