Quantcast

Justices to consider use of mental exam to rebut incapacity defense (access required)

Published: February 25, 2013

Tags: ,

The U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether the state violated the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination by using a defendant’s court-ordered mental evaluation to rebut his claim that his methamphetamine use prevented him from having the requisite mental state to commit capital murder.
© Copyright 2013 Lawyers USA. All Rights Reserved.


Comments

You must be logged in to post comments.

Sign-up for alerts

FEATURED PODCAST


Lawyers USA presents Lawyers in Practice

This is the first edition of Lawyers USA's Lawyers in Practice, where we discuss the hot issues facing practicing attorneys and law firms.

In this edition, we discuss how to prevent legal malpractice claims with better communication, with Jim Calloway, director of the Oklahoma Bar Association's Management Assistance Program, and Dan Pinnington, vice-president of Claims Prevention and Stakeholder Relations at LawPRO, a professional liability carrier based in Toronto, Canada.

Visit the Legal Malpractice Monitor to listen to the podcast.

Click here to download the podcast.