Quantcast
Home / Opinions / Opinion Digest / Informed consent suit fails without expert testimony

Informed consent suit fails without expert testimony

An informed consent plaintiff was required to produce expert testimony showing it to be more likely than not that the undisclosed greater risk of nerve damage from back surgery proximately caused his chronic pain, the Ohio Supreme Court has ruled in reinstating a directed verdict.


Lawyers USA has ceased publication. If you have purchased a research pass or still have additional time on your current Digital Subscription, you may access locked stories by logging in:







Scroll To Top