Quantcast

Ruling gives muscle to Confrontation Clause (access required)
But defense attorneys say ‘bipolar’ Court provides mixed results for defendants

By: Kimberly Atkins
Staff writer
Published: July 11, 2011

Tags: , , , ,

The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling that the Confrontation Clause bars admission of laboratory reports such as blood-alcohol content tests through the in-court testimony of an analyst who did not personally perform the test was viewed as a major victory by some defense attorneys.
© Copyright 2013 Lawyers USA. All Rights Reserved.


Comments

You must be logged in to post comments.

Sign-up for alerts

FEATURED PODCAST


Lawyers USA presents Lawyers in Practice

This is the first edition of Lawyers USA's Lawyers in Practice, where we discuss the hot issues facing practicing attorneys and law firms.

In this edition, we discuss how to prevent legal malpractice claims with better communication, with Jim Calloway, director of the Oklahoma Bar Association's Management Assistance Program, and Dan Pinnington, vice-president of Claims Prevention and Stakeholder Relations at LawPRO, a professional liability carrier based in Toronto, Canada.

Visit the Legal Malpractice Monitor to listen to the podcast.

Click here to download the podcast.