Quantcast

Court rules cardholder not entitled to advance notice (access required)

By: Correy Stephenson
Published: January 24, 2011

Tags: ,

At the time of the transactions at issue, the Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z did not require a credit card issuer to provide change-in-terms notice before increasing the interest rate, the U.S Supreme Court has ruled in an unanimous decision.
© Copyright 2013 Lawyers USA. All Rights Reserved.


Comments

You must be logged in to post comments.

Sign-up for alerts

FEATURED PODCAST


Lawyers USA presents Lawyers in Practice

This is the first edition of Lawyers USA's Lawyers in Practice, where we discuss the hot issues facing practicing attorneys and law firms.

In this edition, we discuss how to prevent legal malpractice claims with better communication, with Jim Calloway, director of the Oklahoma Bar Association's Management Assistance Program, and Dan Pinnington, vice-president of Claims Prevention and Stakeholder Relations at LawPRO, a professional liability carrier based in Toronto, Canada.

Visit the Legal Malpractice Monitor to listen to the podcast.

Click here to download the podcast.