Quantcast

Judiciary Committee advances Kagan’s nomination (access required)
Graham only GOP committee member to support Kagan

By: Kimberly Atkins
Published: July 20, 2010

Tags: , ,

WASHINGTON – In a vote divided largely along party lines, the Senate Judiciary Committee advanced the nomination of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan to the full Senate.

The 13-6 vote – with South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham casting the only GOP vote in Kagan’s favor – was identical to the committee’s vote last year on the nomination of Justice Sonia Sotomayor, with all Democrats voting for Kagan.

Graham said that although he disagrees with Kagan on key issues, he believes that Kagan is a qualified candidate and that is the standard by which the Senate should vote.

“There will be a time where I will disagree” with a Supreme Court nomination, Graham explained before his vote. “But I think that should be the exception, not the rule.”

If Kagan is confirmed by the full Senate to take the seat vacated by retired Justice John Paul Stevens, the Court for the first time will have three women sitting simultaneously on the bench. A full Senate vote is expected within weeks.

While Kagan is expected to win confirmation, Graham is the first Republican senator to support her. At the time of the committee vote, sixteen GOP lawmakers had indicated their intention to vote against Kagan, according to a New York Times tally.

Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa. – who voted against Kagan’s confirmation as solicitor general – voted in favor of her confirmation, but still voiced “grave concerns about her failure to answer questions that I felt ought to have been answered” during the confirmation hearings.

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the committee’s chairman, joined other democratic members in heaping praise on the candidate.

“Kagan demonstrated an impressive knowledge of the law and fidelity to it” during the hearings, Leahy said. “She spoke of judicial restraint, her respect for our democratic institutions, and her commitment to the Constitution and the rule of law. She made clear that she will base her approach to deciding cases on the law and the Constitution, not politics or an ideological agenda.”

Ranking Member Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., disagreed, saying that Kagan espouses a philosophy of judicial activism and expressing his fear that Kagan would “place her politics above the law.”

- Kimberly Atkins


© Copyright 2012 Lawyers USA. All Rights Reserved.


Comments

POST A COMMENT

Sign-up for alerts

NEW FREE WHITE PAPER: E-Discovery

This FREE e-report brought to you by Lawyers USA contains the latest tips for conducting thorough and successful electronic discovery for your trial in 2012. We’ve analyzed the latest court rulings and trends in e-discovery to help you and your clients avoid sanctions and win your case.

Click here to get your free White Paper today!


FEATURED PODCAST

Baby Boomer lawyers and retirement

Nelson Schwartz from The New York Times recently wrote an article titled, "Easing Out the Gray-Haired. Or Not.," spotlighting the fate of the Baby Boomer generation within law firms. Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Valerie C. Samuels, a partner in the firm Posternak Blankstein & Lund LLP and co-chair of the Employment Law Group, and Attorney Roy Ginsburg, to take a look at this generation of baby boomers within law firms, retirement, their fate within the firm, options upon retirement and what this means for law firms: big, small and solo.

Click here to listen to the podcast.

Click here to download the podcast.

Click here for the Podcast archive.