High Court: juvenile life sentences unconstitutional
By:
Kimberly Atkins
Published: May 17, 2010
Tags: cruel and unusual punishment, Eighth Amendment, juvenile, sentencing, Supreme Court
Sentencing a juvenile to life without parole in non-murder cases violates the Constitution’s Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled.
The defendant in the case was 16 years old when he robbed a restaurant. He pleaded guilty, spent a year in jail and was given three years probation.
Within a year of being released he was arrested in connection with another armed robbery. At a probation hearing, his probation was revoked and he was sentenced to life without parole.
He sought post-sentencing relief, citing Roper v. Simmons (in which the Court held the death penalty for juveniles was unconstitutional) to argue that his sentence constituted cruel and unusual punishment.
The Florida Court of Appeal affirmed his sentence, noting that this was a non-capital case, and – in the words of Roper – “death is different.” The Florida Supreme Court denied review.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, and reversed in a 6-3 opinion, holding that the sentence of life without parole for juveniles is so disproportionate to the severity of non-murder cases that it violates the Eighth Amendment.
“The Court has recognized that defendants who do not kill, intend to kill, or foresee that life will be taken are categorically less deserving of the most serious forms of punishment than are murderers,” wrote Justice Anthony Kennedy for the majority. “[I]t follows that, when compared to an adult murderer, a juvenile offender who did not kill or intend to kill has a twice diminished moral culpability. The age of the offender and the nature of the crime each bear on the analysis.”
Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented.
The same day this decision was released, the Court dismissed as improvidently granted a case raising the issue of whether a 13-year old sentenced to life without parole can make a constitutional challenge more than a decade later.
U.S. Supreme Court. Graham v. Florida, No. 08-7412. May 17, 2010. Lawyers USA No. 993-1902. You can link to the full text of this opinion by going to www.lawyersusaonline.com and searching the Lawyers USA website.
© Copyright 2012 Lawyers USA. All Rights Reserved.
- < SENTENCING

- SENTENCING
>
Comments
-
Posted on 05/18/10 at 12:40 pm
POST A COMMENT
NEW FREE WHITE PAPER: E-Discovery
This FREE e-report brought to you by Lawyers USA contains the latest tips for conducting thorough and successful electronic discovery for your trial in 2012. We’ve analyzed the latest court rulings and trends in e-discovery to help you and your clients avoid sanctions and win your case.
Click here to get your free White Paper today!
Most Viewed Stories
LEGAL BLOGS
DC Dicta Legal buzz from Washington
FEATURED PODCAST
Baby Boomer lawyers and retirement
Nelson Schwartz from The New York Times recently wrote an article titled, "Easing Out the Gray-Haired. Or Not.," spotlighting the fate of the Baby Boomer generation within law firms. Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Valerie C. Samuels, a partner in the firm Posternak Blankstein & Lund LLP and co-chair of the Employment Law Group, and Attorney Roy Ginsburg, to take a look at this generation of baby boomers within law firms, retirement, their fate within the firm, options upon retirement and what this means for law firms: big, small and solo.
Click here to listen to the podcast.
Click here to download the podcast.
Click here for the Podcast archive.
![[Print]](http://lawyersusaonline.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://lawyersusaonline.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/email_2.png)
![[RSS Feed]](http://lawyersusaonline.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[del.icio.us]](http://lawyersusaonline.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/delicious.png)
![[Facebook]](http://lawyersusaonline.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
[...] < High Court: juvenile life sentences unconstitutional [...]