-
Home > Practice Areas > Business and Civil Practice > Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment
Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment
By:
Sylvia Hsieh
Published: February 19, 2010
Tags: junk e-mail, spam
Login required
You have clicked on a link to
information that is | ||
Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? For instructions on how to get premium web access, click here. |
||
Interested in Subscribing?
Start by choosing how you'd like your news delivered.
 - Print and Online - |
 - Online Only - |
![[Print]](http://lawyersusaonline.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://api.addthis.com/oexchange/0.8/forward/email/offer?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>)
![[RSS Feed]](http://lawyersusaonline.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[del.icio.us]](http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>)
![[Facebook]](http://lawyersusaonline.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
© Copyright 2012 Lawyers USA. All Rights Reserved.
NEW FREE WHITE PAPER: E-Discovery
This FREE e-report brought to you by Lawyers USA contains the latest tips for conducting thorough and successful electronic discovery for your trial in 2012. We’ve analyzed the latest court rulings and trends in e-discovery to help you and your clients avoid sanctions and win your case.
Click here to get your free White Paper today!
Most Viewed Stories
LEGAL BLOGS
DC Dicta Legal buzz from Washington
![Ask](http://myjeeves.ask.com/mysearch/BookmarkIt?v=1.2&t=webpages&url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![backflip](http://www.backflip.com/add_page_pop.ihtml?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![blinklist](http://blinklist.com/index.php?Action=Blink/addblink.php&Url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&Title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![BlogMarks](http://blogmarks.net/my/new.php?mini=1&simple=1&url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![BuddyMarks](http://www.buddymarks.com/add_bookmark.php?bookmark_title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>&bookmark_url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/){kind=link}
![CiteULike](http://www.citeulike.org/posturl?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![co.mments](http://co.mments.com/track?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Connotea](http://www.connotea.org/addpopup?continue=confirm&uri=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Digg](http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![diigo](http://www.diigo.com/post?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![DotNetKicks](http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![dzone](http://www.dzone.com/links/add.html?description=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>&url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Fark](http://cgi.fark.com/cgi/fark/farkit.pl?u=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&h=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Faves](http://faves.com/Authoring.aspx?u=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&t=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Feed Me Links](http://feedmelinks.com/categorize?from=toolbar&op=submit&name=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>&url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/){kind=link}
![Friendsite](http://friendsite.com/users/bookmark/?u=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&t=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Furl](http://www.furl.net/storeIt.jsp?u=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&t=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Google](http://www.google.com/bookmarks/mark?op=edit&output=popup&bkmk=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Hugg](http://www.hugg.com/node/add/storylink?edit[title]=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>&edit[url]=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/){kind=link}
![Jeqq](http://www.jeqq.com/submit.php?url==http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![linkaGoGo](http://www.linkagogo.com/go/AddNoPopup?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![linkedin](http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>&summary=The+co-owner+of+a+business+is+not+jointly+and+severally+liable+for+a+%24236+million+judgment+for+her+business+partner%27s+sending+of+bulk+e-mails+in+violation+of+a+state+anti-spam+law%2C+the+8th+Circuit+has+ruled.%0AThe+partners+operated+a+company+that+provided+mortgage+leads+to+brokers.+One+of+the+partners+had+experience+with+a+previous+%5B...%5D&source=Lawyers+USA+Online){kind=link}
![LinksMarker](http://www.linksmarker.com/submit.php?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Ma.gnolia](http://ma.gnolia.com/bookmarklet/add?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Mister Wong](http://www.mister-wong.com/index.php?action=addurl&bm_url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&bm_description=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![MySpace](http://www.myspace.com/Modules/PostTo/Pages/?c=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&t=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![MyWeb](http://myweb.yahoo.com/myweb/save?t=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>&u=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/){kind=link}
![Netvouz](http://www.netvouz.com/action/submitBookmark?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>&popup=no){kind=link}
![oneview](http://www.oneview.com/quickadd/neu/addBookmark.jsf?URL=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![OnlyWire](http://www.onlywire.com/submit?u=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&t=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![PlugIM](http://www.plugim.com/submit?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Propeller](http://www.propeller.com/submit/?U=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&T=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Reddit](http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Segnalo](http://segnalo.com/post.html.php?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Simpy](http://www.simpy.com/simpy/LinkAdd.do?href=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Slashdot](http://slashdot.org/bookmark.pl?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Sphere](http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Sphinn](http://sphinn.com/submit.php?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Spurl](http://www.spurl.net/spurl.php?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![StumbleUpon](http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![ThisNext](http://www.thisnext.com/pick/new/submit/sociable/?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&name=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Tumblr](http://www.tumblr.com/share?v=3&u=lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&t=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Twitter](http://twitter.com/home/?status=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>+http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/){kind=link}
![Webride](http://webride.org/discuss/split.php?uri=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Windows Live](https://favorites.live.com/quickadd.aspx?mkt=en-us&url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&title=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Yahoo!](http://bookmarks.yahoo.com/toolbar/savebm?opener=tb&u=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/&t=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Email This to a Friend](http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailFlare?loc=en_US&itemTitle=Business partner not liable for anti-spam judgment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>&uri=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/19/business-partner-not-liable-for-anti-spam-judgment/){kind=link}
FEATURED PODCAST
Baby Boomer lawyers and retirement
Nelson Schwartz from The New York Times recently wrote an article titled, "Easing Out the Gray-Haired. Or Not.," spotlighting the fate of the Baby Boomer generation within law firms. Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Valerie C. Samuels, a partner in the firm Posternak Blankstein & Lund LLP and co-chair of the Employment Law Group, and Attorney Roy Ginsburg, to take a look at this generation of baby boomers within law firms, retirement, their fate within the firm, options upon retirement and what this means for law firms: big, small and solo.
Click here to listen to the podcast.
Click here to download the podcast.
Click here for the Podcast archive.
Comments