-
Home > Practice Areas > Employment Law > Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination
Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination
By:
Pat Murphy
Published: February 4, 2010
Tags: age discrimination, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, reduction in force
Login required
You have clicked on a link to
information that is | ||
Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? For instructions on how to get premium web access, click here. |
||
Interested in Subscribing?
Start by choosing how you'd like your news delivered.
 - Print and Online - |
 - Online Only - |
![[Print]](http://lawyersusaonline.com/wp-content/plugins/dmc_sociable_toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://api.addthis.com/oexchange/0.8/forward/email/offer?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>)
![[RSS Feed]](http://lawyersusaonline.com/wp-content/plugins/dmc_sociable_toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[del.icio.us]](http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>)
![[Facebook]](http://lawyersusaonline.com/wp-content/plugins/dmc_sociable_toolbar/facebook.png)
© Copyright 2012 Lawyers USA. All Rights Reserved.
SUBSCRIBERS: Did you receive the new Lawyers USA Weekly Update in your inbox on Monday?
If not, click here to register and learn more now.
Most Viewed Stories
LEGAL BLOGS
DC Dicta Legal buzz from Washington
![Ask](http://myjeeves.ask.com/mysearch/BookmarkIt?v=1.2&t=webpages&url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![backflip](http://www.backflip.com/add_page_pop.ihtml?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![blinklist](http://blinklist.com/index.php?Action=Blink/addblink.php&Url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&Title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![BlogMarks](http://blogmarks.net/my/new.php?mini=1&simple=1&url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![BuddyMarks](http://www.buddymarks.com/add_bookmark.php?bookmark_title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>&bookmark_url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/){kind=link}
![CiteULike](http://www.citeulike.org/posturl?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![co.mments](http://co.mments.com/track?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Connotea](http://www.connotea.org/addpopup?continue=confirm&uri=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Digg](http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![diigo](http://www.diigo.com/post?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![DotNetKicks](http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![dzone](http://www.dzone.com/links/add.html?description=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>&url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Fark](http://cgi.fark.com/cgi/fark/farkit.pl?u=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&h=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Faves](http://faves.com/Authoring.aspx?u=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&t=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Feed Me Links](http://feedmelinks.com/categorize?from=toolbar&op=submit&name=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>&url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/){kind=link}
![Friendsite](http://friendsite.com/users/bookmark/?u=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&t=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Furl](http://www.furl.net/storeIt.jsp?u=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&t=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Google](http://www.google.com/bookmarks/mark?op=edit&output=popup&bkmk=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Hugg](http://www.hugg.com/node/add/storylink?edit[title]=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>&edit[url]=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/){kind=link}
![Jeqq](http://www.jeqq.com/submit.php?url==http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![linkaGoGo](http://www.linkagogo.com/go/AddNoPopup?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![linkedin](http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>&summary=An+employer+didn%E2%80%99t+violate+federal+age+discrimination+law+when+it+terminated+one+of+its+oldest+workers+as+part+of+a+reduction+in+force%2C+the+6th+Circuit+has+ruled+in+affirming+a+summary+judgment.%0AThe+plaintiff+was+58+years+old+when+she+lost+her+job+as+a+bindery+worker+as+a+result+of+a+reduction+in+force+%5B...%5D&source=Lawyers+USA+Online){kind=link}
![LinksMarker](http://www.linksmarker.com/submit.php?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Ma.gnolia](http://ma.gnolia.com/bookmarklet/add?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Mister Wong](http://www.mister-wong.com/index.php?action=addurl&bm_url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&bm_description=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![MySpace](http://www.myspace.com/Modules/PostTo/Pages/?c=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&t=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![MyWeb](http://myweb.yahoo.com/myweb/save?t=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>&u=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/){kind=link}
![Netvouz](http://www.netvouz.com/action/submitBookmark?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>&popup=no){kind=link}
![oneview](http://www.oneview.com/quickadd/neu/addBookmark.jsf?URL=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![OnlyWire](http://www.onlywire.com/submit?u=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&t=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![PlugIM](http://www.plugim.com/submit?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Propeller](http://www.propeller.com/submit/?U=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&T=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Reddit](http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Segnalo](http://segnalo.com/post.html.php?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Simpy](http://www.simpy.com/simpy/LinkAdd.do?href=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Slashdot](http://slashdot.org/bookmark.pl?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Sphere](http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Sphinn](http://sphinn.com/submit.php?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Spurl](http://www.spurl.net/spurl.php?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![StumbleUpon](http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![ThisNext](http://www.thisnext.com/pick/new/submit/sociable/?url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&name=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Twitter](http://twitter.com/home/?status=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>+http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/){kind=link}
![Webride](http://webride.org/discuss/split.php?uri=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Windows Live](https://favorites.live.com/quickadd.aspx?mkt=en-us&url=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&title=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Yahoo!](http://bookmarks.yahoo.com/toolbar/savebm?opener=tb&u=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn%e2%80%99t-constitute-age-discrimination/&t=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>){kind=link}
![Email This to a Friend](http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailFlare?loc=en_US&itemTitle=Reduction in force doesn’t constitute age discrimination <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/lwusa/images/lock.gif" border=0/></span>&uri=http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2010/02/04/reduction-in-force-doesn’t-constitute-age-discrimination/){kind=link}
FEATURED PODCAST
Baby Boomer lawyers and retirement
Nelson Schwartz from The New York Times recently wrote an article titled, "Easing Out the Gray-Haired. Or Not.," spotlighting the fate of the Baby Boomer generation within law firms. Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Valerie C. Samuels, a partner in the firm Posternak Blankstein & Lund LLP and co-chair of the Employment Law Group, and Attorney Roy Ginsburg, to take a look at this generation of baby boomers within law firms, retirement, their fate within the firm, options upon retirement and what this means for law firms: big, small and solo.
Click here to listen to the podcast.
Click here to download the podcast.
Click here for the Podcast archive.
POST A COMMENT