High Court lab analyst case fizzles out (access required)
Why did the Court punt on forensic evidence?

By Kimberly Atkins
Staff writer
Published: January 29, 2010

Tags:

WASHINGTON - It looked like a potential blockbuster. Just four days after handing down a closely-split ruling - complete with an emphatic dissent - requiring forensic lab analysts to be available to testify in criminal trials if their lab reports are entered into evidence, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in another case that promised to ...
© Copyright 2010 Lawyers USA. All Rights Reserved.


Comments

You must be logged in to post comments.

Stay Connected with Lawyers USA

Lawyers USA keeps you connected with all the latest news affecting you and your practice with Daily, Practice and Breaking News alerts.

To Sign-up or Manage your Alerts, click here.

Feeds/Web 2.0:

FEATURED PODCAST

Tech toys for the holidays

Jim Calloway, the Director of the Oklahoma Bar Association Management Assistance Program, and Sharon Nelson, president of Sensei Enterprises, Inc. present a series of great gift ideas for the tech-savvy professional on your holiday shopping list.

Click here to listen to the podcast.

Click here for the Podcast archive.