High Court lab analyst case fizzles out (access required)
Why did the Court punt on forensic evidence?

By Kimberly Atkins
Staff writer
Published: January 29, 2010

Tags:

WASHINGTON - It looked like a potential blockbuster. Just four days after handing down a closely-split ruling - complete with an emphatic dissent - requiring forensic lab analysts to be available to testify in criminal trials if their lab reports are entered into evidence, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in another case that promised to ...
© Copyright 2010 Lawyers USA. All Rights Reserved.


Comments

You must be logged in to post comments.

Stay Connected with Lawyers USA

Lawyers USA keeps you connected with all the latest news affecting you and your practice with Daily, Practice and Breaking News alerts.

To Sign-up or Manage your Alerts, click here.

Feeds/Web 2.0:

FEATURED PODCAST

Think Twitter's for kids? Think again.

 

Some might think Twitter is a gimmick for young lawyers and associates to get their names out there. In a conference call, attorney and social media consultant Adrian Dayton spoke with Bob White, a partner-level attorney in Florida on how he has Tweeted his way to new clients.

Click here to listen to the podcast.

Click here for the Podcast archive.