Ledbetter Act revives female employee’s pay claims
By:
Pat Murphy
Published: September 16, 2009
Tags: Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act
An employer’s failure to respond to a female employee’s request for a pay raise may constitute a discriminatory act that renews the statute of limitations on a federal gender discrimination claim, the 3rd Circuit has ruled.
The plaintiff worked as a grants coordinator for Allegheny County, Pa.
She sued, alleging that the county committed gender discrimination under Title VII by ignoring her repeated requests for a pay raise.
The plaintiff’s Title VII claim was dismissed as untimely because she first discovered the pay disparity in 2004 and failed to file a complaint with the EEOC until 2007 – long after the expiration of the applicable 300-day limitations period had expired.
However, while her appeal was pending, Congress passed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which applies retroactively and provides that “an unlawful employment practice occurs, with respect to discrimination in compensation … when a discriminatory compensation decision or other practice is adopted, when an individual becomes subject to a discriminatory compensation decision or other practice, or when an individual is affected by application of a discriminatory compensation decision or other practice, including each time wages, benefits, or other compensation is paid.”
The 3rd Circuit held that the County’s failure to respond to the plaintiff’s repeated requests for a raise constituted a discriminatory compensation decision under the Act.
“[T]he failure to answer a request for a raise qualifies as a compensation decision because the result is the same as if the request had been explicitly denied,” the court said.
Accordingly, the court decided that the plaintiff’s Title VII claim was timely with respect to paychecks that she received within 300 days of her EEOC complaint.
U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit. Mikula v. Allegheny County, No. 07-4023. Sept. 10, 2009. Lawyers USA No. 993-1147. Click here for the full text of this opinion.
© Copyright 2012 Lawyers USA. All Rights Reserved.
NEW FREE WHITE PAPER: E-Discovery
This FREE e-report brought to you by Lawyers USA contains the latest tips for conducting thorough and successful electronic discovery for your trial in 2012. We’ve analyzed the latest court rulings and trends in e-discovery to help you and your clients avoid sanctions and win your case.
Click here to get your free White Paper today!
Most Viewed Stories
FEATURED PODCAST
Baby Boomer lawyers and retirement
Nelson Schwartz from The New York Times recently wrote an article titled, "Easing Out the Gray-Haired. Or Not.," spotlighting the fate of the Baby Boomer generation within law firms. Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Valerie C. Samuels, a partner in the firm Posternak Blankstein & Lund LLP and co-chair of the Employment Law Group, and Attorney Roy Ginsburg, to take a look at this generation of baby boomers within law firms, retirement, their fate within the firm, options upon retirement and what this means for law firms: big, small and solo.
Click here to listen to the podcast.
Click here to download the podcast.
Click here for the Podcast archive.
![[Print]](http://lawyersusaonline.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://lawyersusaonline.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/email_2.png)
![[RSS Feed]](http://lawyersusaonline.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[del.icio.us]](http://lawyersusaonline.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/delicious.png)
![[Facebook]](http://lawyersusaonline.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
POST A COMMENT