Quantcast

High Court: Does pretrial motion violate speedy trial right? (access required)

By: Kimberly Atkins
Published: April 20, 2009

Tags: ,

The U.S. Supreme Court will decide next term whether the time requested by a defense attorney to prepare pretrial motions – even if no motion is filed – is excluded from the 70-day time limit for bringing a case to trial under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974.

The Court will review an 8th Circuit case in which the defendant was indicted on drug and firearm possession charges.

Initially his attorney’s motion to extend the deadline to file pretrial motions was granted. But the defendant had a falling out with his attorney, and 28 days later he waived his right to file pretrial motions.

He was appointed new counsel, and filed a motion for leave to file pretrial motions out of time, which was denied.

He then moved to dismiss based on speedy trial violations, since more than 70 days had passed since his indictment. The motion was denied and he was convicted.

The defendant appealed, claiming his conviction violated the Speedy Trial Act.

The Act excludes the time it takes to prepare pretrial motions from speedy trial calculations, but it is silent on whether time spent when no such motion is ultimately filed should be excluded, and the circuits are split on the issue.

The 8th Circuit ruled that a delay where “the court specifically grants time for that purpose” doesn’t violate the Act.

“Here, the district court expressly extended the deadline for filing pretrial motions, at

[the defendant's] request,” the 8th Circuit opinion stated. “Therefore, the 28-day period … is excludable. The fact that [the defendant] did not actually file any pretrial motions is

irrelevant.”

U.S. Supreme Court. Bloate v. U.S., No. 08-728. Certiorari granted April 20, 2009. Ruling below: 534 F.3d 893 (8th Cir. 2008).


© Copyright 2012 Lawyers USA. All Rights Reserved.


POST A COMMENT

Sign-up for alerts

NEW FREE WHITE PAPER: E-Discovery

This FREE e-report brought to you by Lawyers USA contains the latest tips for conducting thorough and successful electronic discovery for your trial in 2012. We’ve analyzed the latest court rulings and trends in e-discovery to help you and your clients avoid sanctions and win your case.

Click here to get your free White Paper today!


FEATURED PODCAST

Baby Boomer lawyers and retirement

Nelson Schwartz from The New York Times recently wrote an article titled, "Easing Out the Gray-Haired. Or Not.," spotlighting the fate of the Baby Boomer generation within law firms. Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Valerie C. Samuels, a partner in the firm Posternak Blankstein & Lund LLP and co-chair of the Employment Law Group, and Attorney Roy Ginsburg, to take a look at this generation of baby boomers within law firms, retirement, their fate within the firm, options upon retirement and what this means for law firms: big, small and solo.

Click here to listen to the podcast.

Click here to download the podcast.

Click here for the Podcast archive.