Quantcast

Can prosecutors be sued for presenting false testimony? (access required)

By: Kimberly Atkins
Published: April 20, 2009

Tags: , ,

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether prosecutors can be civilly liable for a wrongful conviction and incarceration where they allegedly procured false testimony during a criminal investigation, and then introduced that testimony against the defendant at trial.

The case stems from the 1979 convictions of two men for murdering a retired police department captain who was working as a security guard. They were sentenced to life in prison.

In 2002, the Iowa Supreme Court vacated the convictions, finding that prosecutors erred by failing to disclose evidence of an alternative suspect.

Both men sued the county and the former prosecutors, arguing they used unconstitutionally perjured and fabricated testimony and withheld evidence. They also alleged that one prosecutor defamed them.

The prosecutors moved for summary judgment based on qualified and absolute immunity.

A U.S. District Court said some of the prosecutors were not immune from suit.

The 8th Circuit agreed.

“We find immunity does not extend to the actions of a county attorney who violates a person’s substantive due process rights by obtaining, manufacturing, coercing and fabricating evidence before filing formal charges, because this is not ‘a distinctly prosecutorial function,’” the court said.

A decision from the Supreme Court is expected next term.

U.S. Supreme Court. Pottawattamie County v. McGhee, No. 08-1065. Certiorari granted April 20, 2009. Ruling below: 547 F.3d 922 (8th Cir. 2008).


© Copyright 2012 Lawyers USA. All Rights Reserved.


Comments

  • Either perjury is a lie, or it isn’t. Ask the former DA for Houston.

    Posted on 04/21/09 at 9:45 am
  • Larry Watson says:

    The Judiciary is granting excessive protection to justices and prosecutors without requiring mandatory investigation and prosecution by federal authorities, who solely can bring criminal complaints and possible relief to private citizens. Immunity is now available to clerks of the court. Soon you won’t be able to address offenses committed by the coffee man at the courthouse because his role will be deemed integral to the judicial process

    Posted on 04/22/09 at 8:18 am

POST A COMMENT

Sign-up for alerts

NEW FREE WHITE PAPER: E-Discovery

This FREE e-report brought to you by Lawyers USA contains the latest tips for conducting thorough and successful electronic discovery for your trial in 2012. We’ve analyzed the latest court rulings and trends in e-discovery to help you and your clients avoid sanctions and win your case.

Click here to get your free White Paper today!


FEATURED PODCAST

Baby Boomer lawyers and retirement

Nelson Schwartz from The New York Times recently wrote an article titled, "Easing Out the Gray-Haired. Or Not.," spotlighting the fate of the Baby Boomer generation within law firms. Attorney and co-host Bob Ambrogi welcomes Attorney Valerie C. Samuels, a partner in the firm Posternak Blankstein & Lund LLP and co-chair of the Employment Law Group, and Attorney Roy Ginsburg, to take a look at this generation of baby boomers within law firms, retirement, their fate within the firm, options upon retirement and what this means for law firms: big, small and solo.

Click here to listen to the podcast.

Click here to download the podcast.

Click here for the Podcast archive.