<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Benchmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks</link>
	<description>Just another Lawyer\&#039;s USA Online weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:47:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>‘Sleep driving’ defense allowed in DUI case</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/06/07/sleep-driving-defense-allowed-in-dui-case/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/06/07/sleep-driving-defense-allowed-in-dui-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driving under the influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drunk driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sleep driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sleep walking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/?p=5244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Oregon man has had his felony drunk driving conviction overturned on the ground that he was improperly barred from presenting a “sleep driving” defense at trial. Click here to read the full article, and visit the Lawyers USA home page at lawyersusaonline.com for the latest legal news.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Oregon man has had his felony drunk driving conviction overturned on the ground that he was improperly barred from presenting a “sleep driving” defense at trial.</p>
<p><a title="Click here" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/06/07/benchmarks-sleep-driving-defense-allowed-in-dui-case/"><strong>Click here</strong></a> to read the full article, and visit the Lawyers USA home page at <strong><a title="lawyersusaonline.com" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/">lawyersusaonline.com</a></strong> for the latest legal news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/06/07/sleep-driving-defense-allowed-in-dui-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EA Sports ruling a game-changer for NCAA athletes</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/06/04/ea-sports-ruling-a-game-changer-for-ncaa-athletes/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/06/04/ea-sports-ruling-a-game-changer-for-ncaa-athletes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right of publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/?p=5241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal court ruling last month looks to be the breakthrough long sought by college athletes who claim they deserve a share of the hundreds of millions of dollars generated by their performances on NCAA football fields and basketball courts. Click here to read the full article, and visit the Lawyers USA home page at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal court ruling last month looks to be the breakthrough long sought by college athletes who claim they deserve a share of the hundreds of millions of dollars generated by their performances on NCAA football fields and basketball courts.</p>
<p><a title="Click here" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/06/04/benchmarks-ea-sports-ruling-a-game-changer-for-ncaa-athletes/"><strong>Click here</strong></a> to read the full article, and visit the Lawyers USA home page at <strong><a title="lawyersusaonline.com" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/">lawyersusaonline.com</a></strong> for the latest legal news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/06/04/ea-sports-ruling-a-game-changer-for-ncaa-athletes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Farm must defend drunk homeowner</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/31/state-farm-must-defend-drunk-homeowner/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/31/state-farm-must-defend-drunk-homeowner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 13:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duty to defend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duty to indemnify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeowners insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intentional injury exclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/?p=5236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Pennsylvania court ruled earlier this month that State Farm had a duty to defend a 71-year-old homeowner sued for shooting a houseguest he mistook for an intruder. The Pennsylvania Superior Court concluded that the fact the homeowner had a blood alcohol level of .187 when he pulled the trigger may mean that an intentional [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Pennsylvania court ruled earlier this month that State Farm had a duty to defend a 71-year-old homeowner sued for shooting a houseguest he mistook for an intruder.</p>
<p>The Pennsylvania Superior Court concluded that the fact the homeowner had a blood alcohol level of .187 when he pulled the trigger may mean that an intentional injury exclusion in State Farm’s policy does not bar coverage of the lawsuit.</p>
<p><a title="Click here" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/31/benchmarks-state-farm-must-defend-drunk-homeowner/"><strong>Click here</strong></a> to read the full article, and visit the Lawyers USA home page at <strong><a title="lawyersusaonline.com" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/">lawyersusaonline.com</a></strong> for the latest legal news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/31/state-farm-must-defend-drunk-homeowner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Litigation privilege barred attorney fraud claims</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/29/litigation-privilege-barred-attorney-fraud-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/29/litigation-privilege-barred-attorney-fraud-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 13:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[absolute immunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intentional infliction of emotional distress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation privilege]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/?p=5232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Five Connecticut divorce lawyers have convinced the state’s high court that they enjoyed absolutely immunity when sued for fraudulently concealing the assets of a client. Click here to read the full article, and visit the Lawyers USA home page at lawyersusaonline.com for the latest legal news.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Five Connecticut divorce lawyers have convinced the state’s high court that they enjoyed absolutely immunity when sued for fraudulently concealing the assets of a client.</p>
<p><a title="Click here" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/29/benchmarks-litigation-privilege-barred-attorney-fraud-claims/"><strong>Click here</strong></a> to read the full article, and visit the Lawyers USA home page at <strong><a title="lawyersusaonline.com" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/">lawyersusaonline.com</a></strong> for the latest legal news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/29/litigation-privilege-barred-attorney-fraud-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ex-NCAA quarterback can pursue publicity claim against EA Sports</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/22/ex-ncaa-quarterback-can-pursue-publicity-claim-against-ea-sports/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/22/ex-ncaa-quarterback-can-pursue-publicity-claim-against-ea-sports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right of publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/?p=5228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The First Amendment does not bar the lawsuit of a former Rutgers quarterback who claims that EA Sports used his likeness without permission in the immensely popular “NCAA Football” series of video games. That’s the conclusion reached Tuesday by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Click here to read the full article, and visit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The First Amendment does not bar the lawsuit of a former Rutgers quarterback who claims that EA Sports used his likeness without permission in the immensely popular “NCAA Football” series of video games.</p>
<p>That’s the conclusion reached Tuesday by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.</p>
<p><a title="Click here" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/22/benchmarks-ex-ncaa-quarterback-can-pursue-likeness-claim-against-ea-sports/"><strong>Click here</strong></a> to read the full article, and visit the Lawyers USA home page at <strong><a title="lawyersusaonline.com" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/">lawyersusaonline.com</a></strong> for the latest legal news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/22/ex-ncaa-quarterback-can-pursue-publicity-claim-against-ea-sports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mo. court reinstates $28M punitive award for fatal plane crash</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/20/mo-court-reinstates-28m-punitive-award-for-fatal-plane-crash/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/20/mo-court-reinstates-28m-punitive-award-for-fatal-plane-crash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punitive damages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/?p=5224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The third time apparently is a charm. After an award of $28 million in punitive damages in a product liability case over a fatal plane crash twice failed to pass judicial scrutiny, a Missouri appellate court sitting en banc decided that the jury had it right in the first place. Click here to read the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The third time apparently is a charm. After an award of $28 million in punitive damages in a product liability case over a fatal plane crash twice failed to pass judicial scrutiny, a Missouri appellate court sitting en banc decided that the jury had it right in the first place.</p>
<p><a title="Click here" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/20/benchmarks-mo-court-restores-28m-punitive-award-for-fatal-plane-crash/"><strong>Click here</strong></a> to read the full article, and visit the Lawyers USA home page at <strong><a title="lawyersusaonline.com" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/">lawyersusaonline.com</a></strong> for the latest legal news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/20/mo-court-reinstates-28m-punitive-award-for-fatal-plane-crash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indiana Supremes restore cap on punitive damages</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/16/indiana-supremes-restore-cap-on-punitive-damages/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/16/indiana-supremes-restore-cap-on-punitive-damages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clergy sex abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damage caps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punitive damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to jury trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[separation of powers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/?p=5221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Indiana Supreme Court has overturned a lower court ruling that the state’s $50,000 cap on punitive damages violated a personal injury plaintiff’s right to a jury trial. Click here to read the full article, and visit the Lawyers USA home page at lawyersusaonline.com for the latest legal news.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Indiana Supreme Court has overturned a lower court ruling that the state’s $50,000 cap on punitive damages violated a personal injury plaintiff’s right to a jury trial.</p>
<p><a title="Click here" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/16/benchmarks-indiana-supremes-restore-cap-on-punitive-damages/"><strong>Click here</strong></a> to read the full article, and visit the Lawyers USA home page at <strong><a title="lawyersusaonline.com" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/">lawyersusaonline.com</a></strong> for the latest legal news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/16/indiana-supremes-restore-cap-on-punitive-damages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coca-Cola could require employee to undergo mental exam</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/13/coca-cola-could-require-employee-to-undergo-mental-exam/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/13/coca-cola-could-require-employee-to-undergo-mental-exam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 13:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans with Disabilities Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical exam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental examination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/?p=5217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal court of appeals has decided that Coca-Cola didn’t violate the Americans with Disabilities Act when it required an employee to undergo a psychiatric fitness-for-duty evaluation. Click here to read the full article, and visit the Lawyers USA home page at lawyersusaonline.com for the latest legal news.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal court of appeals has decided that Coca-Cola didn’t violate the Americans with Disabilities Act when it required an employee to undergo a psychiatric fitness-for-duty evaluation.</p>
<p><a title="Click here" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/13/benchmarks-coca-cola-could-require-employee-to-undergo-mental-exam/"><strong>Click here</strong></a> to read the full article, and visit the Lawyers USA home page at <strong><a title="lawyersusaonline.com" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/">lawyersusaonline.com</a></strong> for the latest legal news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/13/coca-cola-could-require-employee-to-undergo-mental-exam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube video sinks defense in child murder case</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/08/youtube-video-sinks-defense-in-child-murder-case/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/08/youtube-video-sinks-defense-in-child-murder-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 13:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/?p=5213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Delaware man accused of murdering his infant daughter wanted jurors to believe that he was absolutely devastated by what he claimed was a tragic accident. Unfortunately, the “grieving” father made the mistake of posting a video on YouTube showing him yukking it up as a participant in a silly radio contest. Click here to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Delaware man accused of murdering his infant daughter wanted jurors to believe that he was absolutely devastated by what he claimed was a tragic accident.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the “grieving” father made the mistake of posting a video on YouTube showing him yukking it up as a participant in a silly radio contest.</p>
<p><a title="Click here" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/08/benchmarks-youtube-video-sinks-defense-in-child-murder-case/"><strong>Click here</strong></a> to read the full article, and visit the Lawyers USA home page at <strong><a title="lawyersusaonline.com" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/">lawyersusaonline.com</a></strong> for the latest legal news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/08/youtube-video-sinks-defense-in-child-murder-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ohio ruling on text solicitations draws mixed reviews</title>
		<link>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/07/ohio-ruling-on-text-solicitations-draws-mixed-reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/07/ohio-ruling-on-text-solicitations-draws-mixed-reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 11:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text messaging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/?p=5210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month, Ohio became the first state to give the green light to lawyers sending text messages to solicit prospective clients. But at least one expert says it makes no sense to treat text message advertisements differently from a lawyer making a direct phone call solicitation, which is universally deemed a violation of professional rules [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last month, Ohio became the first state to give the green light to lawyers sending text messages to solicit prospective clients.</p>
<p>But at least one expert says it makes no sense to treat text message advertisements differently from a lawyer making a direct phone call solicitation, which is universally deemed a violation of professional rules of conduct.</p>
<p><a title="Click here" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/blog/2013/05/07/ohio-ruling-on-text-solicitations-draws-mixed-reviews/"><strong>Click here</strong></a> to read the full article, and visit the Lawyers USA home page at <strong><a title="lawyersusaonline.com" href="http://lawyersusaonline.com/">lawyersusaonline.com</a></strong> for the latest legal news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyersusaonline.com/benchmarks/2013/05/07/ohio-ruling-on-text-solicitations-draws-mixed-reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
